Judge (Your Honor)
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00018238.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson (likely law enforcement), by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. They are reviewing a video (Government Exhibit 296) showing the initial police search of a residence (likely Epstein's Palm Beach home), describing the layout, and identifying the property manager, Janusz Banasiak, as he is being read a search warrant.
DOJ-OGR-00000716.jpg
This document is page 78 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, containing victim impact statements. One victim details the psychological trauma caused by Epstein, including a near-suicide attempt, and expresses frustration that his death allowed him to escape sentencing. The page concludes with the beginning of a statement from a second victim who describes being raped by Epstein when she was a 16-year-old virgin.
DOJ-OGR-00018935.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of a 'spiral bound book' of message slips during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Pagliuca objects under Federal Rules of Evidence 801 and 803.6, arguing the witness lacks the knowledge to establish a business record foundation, while Moe counters that the authenticity of the book itself is not in dispute.
DOJ-OGR-00018482.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, typically associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named McHugh is testifying under direct examination by Ms. Moe (Government), authenticating JPMorgan records. McHugh confirms comparing physical binder exhibits against system records to ensure they are identical account opening documents and statements kept in the normal course of business.
DOJ-OGR-00013248.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, who explicitly denies ever having sexual intercourse with Mr. Epstein. The witness also corrects the record regarding a previous statement, clarifying that 'he did four times' rather than 'I did four times'.
DOJ-OGR-00013832.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains defense arguments asserting that Ghislaine Maxwell did not 'entice' a victim known as 'Jane' to travel for illegal purposes, arguing that return trips to Palm Beach do not constitute enticement to commit crimes in New York. The defense emphasizes testimony stating that Jeffrey Epstein's office typically handled travel arrangements, with Maxwell only occasionally assisting.
DOJ-OGR-00013351.jpg
A page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Pagliuca objects to the admission of a 'spiral bound book' of message slips under the business records exception (Rule 803.6), arguing the witness (Hesse) lacks knowledge of how they were recorded or stored. Prosecutor Moe responds that the authenticity of the book has been established by the witness and is not in dispute.
DOJ-OGR-00010671.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 24, 2022, containing a Victim Impact Statement addressed directly to Ghislaine Maxwell. The statement, submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, details the long-term psychological trauma, nightmares, and hyper-vigilance suffered by the victim due to Maxwell's grooming and abuse. The victim confronts Maxwell about her role in arranging rapes and molestations, rejects Maxwell's past claim of being like a 'mother,' and expresses a desire for Maxwell to remain imprisoned for life.
DOJ-OGR-00010491.jpg
This document is a page from a character reference letter filed in court on June 15, 2022, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell prior to her sentencing. The anonymous author, a family friend of over 60 years, describes the difficult upbringing of the Maxwell children under their 'narcissistic' father, Robert Maxwell, and highlights Ghislaine's intelligence and work ethic at Oxford. The letter appeals to the judge for leniency, noting Ghislaine's regret over meeting Jeffrey Epstein and the harsh conditions she has endured in jail, including sleep deprivation.
DOJ-OGR-00009498.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Exhibit A-5922 within Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case) containing a legal argument. The text discusses a tax fraud case involving David Parse, Carrie Yackee, Jenkins & Gilchrist, and Deutsche Bank, focusing on whether Parse knew transactions were made solely for tax losses rather than investment purposes. This appears to be a citation of case law (likely U.S. v. Daugerdas) used as a precedent within the broader filing, rather than a direct record of Epstein's activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity