DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
1.17 MB
Extraction Summary
9
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket / case history report (sdny cm/ecf)
File Size:
1.17 MB
Summary
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 11 and February 24, 2022. It details motions for a new trial filed by the defense, communications regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity (specifically Juror 50), and the granting of an amicus curiae brief. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (USA), the defense team (Sternheim, Everdell), and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the filings, defendant in the case.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Federal judge signing orders and receiving letters.
|
| Alison Moe | Prosecutor (USA) |
Author of letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Maurene Comey | Prosecutor (USA) |
Author of letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Prosecutor (USA) |
Author of letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Prosecutor (USA) |
Author of letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Filing motions on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Filing letters on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of a motion mentioned in Order 607 concerning juror anonymity and inquiry.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA |
United States of America (Prosecution/Government)
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (Court)
|
|
| New York Times Company |
Media entity mentioned regarding a motion in entry 598.
|
|
| Press-Enter. Co. |
Cited in case law precedent.
|
Timeline (4 events)
02/11/2022
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
|
|
Western District of New York (cited in case law).
|
|
|
Location cited in case law precedent.
|
Relationships (3)
Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian)
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Bobbi C. Sternheim
Letter by USA... from Alison Moe
Key Quotes (3)
"The narrowly tailored redactions further the important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining juror anonymity and privacy."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court will docket Juror 50's motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
Quote #2
"As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,947 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page95 of 208
A-91
A-91
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
motion if: It is timely submitted by February 18, 2022; (Amicus Brief due by 2/18/2022)
(Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/11/22)(jw) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
(Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/11/22)(jw) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
02/11/2022 | 598 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 11,
2022 re: motion by the New York Times Company. Document filed by USA. (Moe,
Alison) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 11,
2022 re: motion by the New York Times Company. Document filed by USA. (Moe,
Alison) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
02/11/2022 | 599 | MOTION for New Trial to Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-
Trial Motions. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered:
02/11/2022)
Trial Motions. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered:
02/11/2022)
02/11/2022 | 600 | MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re 599 MOTION for New Trial to
Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-Trial Motions.. OMNIBUS
MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re Post-Trial Motions (Everdell,
Christian) (Entered: 02/12/2022)
Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-Trial Motions.. OMNIBUS
MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re Post-Trial Motions (Everdell,
Christian) (Entered: 02/12/2022)
02/15/2022 | 601 | SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 02/15/2022)
02/16/2022 | 602 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C.
Sternheim dated 02/16/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 596 (Sternheim, Bobbi)
(Entered: 02/16/2022)
Sternheim dated 02/16/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 596 (Sternheim, Bobbi)
(Entered: 02/16/2022)
02/16/2022 | 603 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 16,
2022 re: Letter regarding proposed redactions. Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison)
(Entered: 02/16/2022)
Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 16,
2022 re: Letter regarding proposed redactions. Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison)
(Entered: 02/16/2022)
02/17/2022 | 604 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. ENDORSEMENT: The request for leave to file an
amicus brief in accordance with this Court's February 11, 2022 order is GRANTED. SO
ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/17/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 02/17/2022)
AN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. ENDORSEMENT: The request for leave to file an
amicus brief in accordance with this Court's February 11, 2022 order is GRANTED. SO
ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/17/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 02/17/2022)
02/18/2022 | 605 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The parties are hereby ORDERED to re-submit via
email revised redactions to the parties' briefing on the Defendant's motion for a new trial
by February 22, 2022. The revised proposed redactions shall be consistent with this
Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/18/2022) (lnl) (Entered:
02/18/2022)
email revised redactions to the parties' briefing on the Defendant's motion for a new trial
by February 22, 2022. The revised proposed redactions shall be consistent with this
Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/18/2022) (lnl) (Entered:
02/18/2022)
02/21/2022 | 606 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C
Sternheim dated 02/21/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 605 (Sternheim, Bobbi)
(Entered: 02/21/2022)
Sternheim dated 02/21/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 605 (Sternheim, Bobbi)
(Entered: 02/21/2022)
02/24/2022 | 607 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's proposed
redactions revised in response to this Court's order. See Dkt. Nos. 605, 606. The Court
has reviewed the proposed redactions and concludes that they are in accordance with its
prior orders. See Dkt. Nos. 596, 605. The narrowly tailored redactions further the
important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining juror
anonymity and privacy. As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests
justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing and specific
factual information developed by the parties that has not been publicly reported in the
press and that the parties propose be inquired about at any forthcoming hearing. Dkt. No.
596 at 4 (citing United States v. McCoy et al., No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 312 (text
order) (W.D.N.Y. May 26, 2017); id. Dkt. No. 329 at 38-39; Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior
Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984)). Accordingly, the parties are
ORDERED to docket the redacted briefs, accompanying exhibits, and their January 13
letters, by February 25, 2022. The Court will docket Juror 50's motion. As noted in its
prior Order, following the Court's resolution of the Defendant's motion or a hearing, all
redactions revised in response to this Court's order. See Dkt. Nos. 605, 606. The Court
has reviewed the proposed redactions and concludes that they are in accordance with its
prior orders. See Dkt. Nos. 596, 605. The narrowly tailored redactions further the
important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining juror
anonymity and privacy. As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests
justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing and specific
factual information developed by the parties that has not been publicly reported in the
press and that the parties propose be inquired about at any forthcoming hearing. Dkt. No.
596 at 4 (citing United States v. McCoy et al., No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 312 (text
order) (W.D.N.Y. May 26, 2017); id. Dkt. No. 329 at 38-39; Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior
Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984)). Accordingly, the parties are
ORDERED to docket the redacted briefs, accompanying exhibits, and their January 13
letters, by February 25, 2022. The Court will docket Juror 50's motion. As noted in its
prior Order, following the Court's resolution of the Defendant's motion or a hearing, all
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
91/113
DOJ-OGR-00020713
91/113
DOJ-OGR-00020713
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document