This document is a photocopy of a 'Letters to the Editor' page from The Palm Beach Post dated August 25, 2006. It features a highlighted letter by Aileen Josephs criticizing Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (specifically Jack Goldberger and Alan Dershowitz) for attacking victims' reputations and asserting that money and power buy justice in Palm Beach County. Handwritten notes indicate this clipping was processed by staff to be included in the 'Jeffrey Epstein File' with the State Attorney.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Subject of a letter to the editor criticizing his legal team and the justice system.
|
| Aileen Josephs | Author |
Author of the letter to the editor criticizing Epstein's camp.
|
| Barry Krischer | Palm Beach County State Attorney |
Mentioned in comparison to the Rush Limbaugh case; criticized for political motivations.
|
| Rush Limbaugh | Comparison Case Subject |
Mentioned as an exception where money/power didn't buy justice due to political pressure.
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Identified as one of Epstein's 'high-powered attorneys'.
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Attorney |
Identified as one of Epstein's 'high-powered attorneys'.
|
| Mark L. Winans | Author |
Author of an unrelated letter regarding Westgate Tabernacle.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Palm Beach Post |
Newspaper publishing the letters.
|
|
| State Attorney's Office |
Recipient of the filed document; criticized in the text.
|
|
| Westgate Tabernacle |
Subject of an adjacent, unrelated letter.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned regarding justice system.
|
|
|
Location of author Aileen Josephs.
|
|
|
Location of author Mark L. Winans.
|
"I think that Jeffrey Epstein's 'camp' should be happy that money and power does buy justice in this county"Source
"The Epstein camp should stop attacking the victims' reputation in the media."Source
"Let's not forget — they are children. A child's reputation is sacred."Source
"Also, according to the law, lack of knowledge of the age of the victim is no defense for statutory rape or any sexual crime committed against a child."Source
"Past cases indicate that children's rights, victim's rights and women's rights are meaningless, and often the victim is re-victimized."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,201 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document