This document is a scanned copy of an article titled 'South China Sea: making sense of nonsense' by Mark Valencia, published in The Japan Times on June 29. The text analyzes contradictory actions by the Chinese government, contrasting diplomatic assurances given by Defense Minister Liang Guanglie with aggressive maritime incidents against Vietnamese vessels. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029950' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger congressional investigation file.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Valencia | Author |
Writer of The Japan Times article 'South China Sea: making sense of nonsense'
|
| Liang Guanglie | Chinese Defense Minister General |
Quoted regarding China's commitment to peace at the Shangri-la Dialogue
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Japan Times |
Publisher of the article
|
|
| Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) |
Target of China's 'charm offensive' and U.S. strategy
|
|
| China's government |
Entity giving mixed signals regarding foreign policy
|
|
| U.S. government |
Mentioned regarding strategy to protect ASEAN nations
|
|
| Shangri-la Dialogue |
Conference where Liang Guanglie spoke
|
|
| Central Military Commission |
Chinese military organization that sent vice chairmen to Southeast Asia
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Region of conflict and subject of the article
|
|
|
Country involved in the conflict
|
|
|
Location of the Shangri-la Dialogue
|
|
|
Implied location/origin of the survey ship involved in the incident
|
|
|
Region visited by Central Military Commission vice chairmen
|
"China is committed to maintaining peace and stability in the South China Sea"Source
"China stood by the DOC"Source
"making sense of nonsense"Source
"blatant violations of the solemnly agreed Declaration on Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC)"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,610 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document