Legal Filing (Court Document Conclusion Page) - DOJ-OGR-00010306

Processing Document...

0%

Initializing...

Extraction Summary

6

People

3

Organizations

1

Locations

1

Events

2

Relationships

1

Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court document - conclusion page)

File Size: 275 KB

Summary

This is the conclusion page (page 16 of 16) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 15, 2022. The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should be denied based on reasons in the Government's memorandum. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.

People (6)

Name	Role	Context
Damian Williams	United States Attorney	Head signatory for the Government's submission.
Maurene Comey	Assistant United States Attorney	Signatory on the brief.
Alison Moe	Assistant United States Attorney	Signatory on the brief.
Lara Pomerantz	Assistant United States Attorney	Signatory on the brief.
Andrew Rohrbach	Assistant United States Attorney	Signatory on the brief.
Defendant	Defendant	Subject of the motion for a new trial (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

Organizations (3)

Name	Type	Context
United States Attorney's Office		The prosecution team submitting the document.
Department of Justice (DOJ)		Indicated by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
The Government		Refers to the prosecution.

Timeline (1 events)

March 15, 2022

Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial.

New York, New York

Damian Williams Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach

View

Locations (1)

Location	Context
New York, New York	Location where the document was dated and submitted.

Relationships (2)

Damian Williams → Professional/Hierarchical → Maurene Comey

Both listed as attorneys for the US Government, with Williams as the US Attorney and Comey as Assistant.

Maurene Comey → Colleagues → Alison Moe

Co-signatories as Assistant United States Attorneys.

Key Quotes (1)

"the defendant’s motion for a new trial should be denied."

Source

DOJ-OGR-00010306.jpg

Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (471 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 648 Filed 03/15/22 Page 16 of 16

Conclusion

For these reasons, and for the reasons set forth in the Government’s memorandum in
opposition (Dkt. No. 643), the defendant’s motion for a new trial should be denied.

Dated: New York, New York
March 15, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney

By: s/
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys

14

DOJ-OGR-00010306

View Original PDF