This document is a 2006 New York Times article (stamped by House Oversight) detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The police sought arrest warrants based on interviews with victims like Ms. Robson, but the State Attorney delayed, opting for a grand jury after Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) presented evidence attacking the accusers' credibility. Police Chief Reiter formally questioned the State Attorney's handling of the case, suggesting he disqualify himself.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Accused |
Accused of paying for teenage girls and engaging in intercourse with at least one; passed a lie-detector test accordi...
|
| Ms. Robson | Witness/Victim |
Interviewed by police at age 19; stated Epstein paid her to bring teenage girls to his home.
|
| Mr. Lefcourt | Defense Lawyer |
Epstein's lawyer; claimed accusers lied and questioned the police's motivation for releasing the report.
|
| Mr. Krischer | State Attorney |
Prosecutor handling the case; decided to convene a grand jury instead of issuing immediate warrants; delayed grand ju...
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Defense Team |
Met with prosecutors to share information attacking accusers' credibility based on MySpace posts.
|
| Chief Reiter | Police Chief |
Palm Beach Police Chief; wrote to Krischer questioning the handling of the case and suggested Krischer disqualify him...
|
| Mike Edmondson | Spokesman |
Spokesman for Mr. Krischer; defended the decision to use a grand jury.
|
| Bruce J. Winick | Law Professor |
University of Miami professor commenting on Florida legal procedures regarding grand juries.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of police and location of events
|
|
|
Location of alleged crimes
|
Complete text extracted from the document (2,928 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document