Chief Reiter
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Krischer
|
Professional conflict |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional conflict |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional training |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Detective
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Town of Palm Beach
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional cooperation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krisher
|
Professional counterparts |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's defense team
|
Intimidation surveillance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Noel St. Pierre
|
Professional operational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional strained |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alfredo Rodriguez
|
Suspect investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Indirect communication mention |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Professional contextual |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Subordinate superior |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Responsibility delegation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Contact coordination |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Victim notification process regarding Epstein's case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Authorization of a 'trash pull' | Palm Beach, FL (specificall... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Briefing of Chief of Police | Police Station | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition in B.B. vs. Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Call between West Palm Beach manager and Chief Reiter | Phone Call | View |
| N/A | N/A | Swearing-in ceremony of Barry Krischer | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police Chief Reiter refers matter to FBI. | Palm Beach/Miami | View |
| N/A | Deposition | Chief Reiter provided deposition testimony regarding the Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Surveillance of Police Chief Reiter and Detective Recarey. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Chief Reiter investigates Jeffrey Epstein | Palm Beach | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Timeline marker for the state of the investigation where the press is still 'speaking in whispers'. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Deposition | Chief Reiter gave a deposition where he testified about being criticized by a Town of Palm Beach ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Villafaña emails Lefkowitz about discussing agreement with attorney representative and victims, a... | N/A | View |
| 2006-04-20 | N/A | Reporting officer documents disapproval of plea deal and briefing of Chief Reiter. | Palm Beach Police Station | View |
016-08.pdf
This incident report details an ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for unlawful sexual activity and lewd and lascivious molestation, including witness interviews, Grand Jury postponements, and a plea deal offer. It highlights attempts to intimidate victims and the process of preparing arrest warrants for Epstein and his associates. The document also mentions the involvement of various legal entities and individuals in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00023189.tif
This document discusses the legal defense strategies employed by Jeffrey Epstein's extensive team of attorneys, highlighting their ability to secure concessions despite initial USAO requirements. It details how prominent lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr influenced prosecutor Alex Acosta, and addresses assertions from individuals like Menchel, Sloman, and Lourie that their relationships with Epstein's counsel did not affect their actions, while noting the significant financial investment in Epstein's defense.
DOJ-OGR-00023124.tif
This document details aspects of an agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, including his guilty plea timeline, immunity for co-conspirators, and conditions for federal investigation suspension. It also mentions a concern expressed via email by Lefkowitz to Lourie about media leaks prejudicing Epstein and a New York Post report on Epstein's plea deal from October 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023120.tif
This document details communications and events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's potential plea deal and sex offender registration in September 2007. It highlights objections from Sanchez and Lefkowitz to the registration requirement, citing a 'misunderstanding' at a prior meeting where prosecutors Krischer and Belohlavek initially stated the offense was not registrable. The document shows efforts by Epstein's defense to avoid registration and secure an 18-month federal camp sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00023310.tif
This document details the Office of Professional Responsibility's (OPR) findings and criticisms regarding Acosta's handling of victim notification in the Epstein case. It focuses on Acosta's personal involvement in the notification process, his decision to defer responsibility to the State Attorney, and his failure to ensure victims were properly informed of Epstein's state court pleas, despite his staff's efforts. The document highlights the inadequate communication and coordination between the USAO, Acosta, and the State Attorney's Office concerning victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00023245.tif
This document details communications and events in September-October 2007 concerning the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and informing victims. Key figures like Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie discuss preventing the NPA from becoming public, managing information disclosure to victims, and coordinating legal representation for the victims to recover damages from Epstein. There is a clear effort to control the narrative and information flow regarding the NPA and its implications for the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021474.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report regarding the Epstein case, specifically criticizing Alexander Acosta's handling of victim notification. It details how Acosta intervened to stop his staff (Villafaña and Sloman) from implementing their notification plan, instead deferring responsibility to the State Attorney and Chief Reiter without ensuring a proper process was in place. Consequently, many victims were unaware of Epstein's plea hearing and only learned of the outcome through the media or after the fact.
DOJ-OGR-00021433.jpg
This document outlines the internal DOJ communications in June 2008 regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and the handling of victim notifications. It details how prosecutor Villafaña was instructed by superiors Alex Acosta and Jeff Sloman to avoid direct victim notification, instead delegating that task to PBPD Chief Reiter. The text also confirms that the Deputy Attorney General had deemed federal prosecution appropriate just days before the plea deal deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00021351.jpg
This legal document discusses the effectiveness of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, in portraying his case as legally complex to prosecutors like Alex Acosta. It also examines whether preexisting relationships between prosecutors (Menchel, Sloman, Lourie, and Acosta) and defense counsel improperly influenced the outcome, concluding, based on an OPR investigation, that they did not. The document highlights how Epstein's wealth funded a formidable defense that successfully negotiated concessions from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO).
DOJ-OGR-00021286.jpg
This document outlines the specific terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein, including deadlines for his guilty plea (Oct 2007) and self-reporting (Jan 2008). It explicitly grants immunity to 'any potential co-conspirator' and four assistants, waives Epstein's appeal rights, and notes the parties' intent to keep the agreement private. The document also details a communication from Epstein's lawyer, Lefkowitz, expressing concern over media leaks after the New York Post reported on the 18-month plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021285.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal communications regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights efforts by the prosecution team (Villafaña, Acosta) to limit the disclosure of the agreement's terms, specifically regarding financial damages, to the Palm Beach Police Chief and the public. The document outlines the specific provisions of the NPA, including the guilty plea to solicitation of minors, the 30-month recommended sentence structure, and the handling of victim damages.
DOJ-OGR-00021282.jpg
This legal document details communications from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, specifically Sanchez and Lefkowitz, to prosecutors Acosta and Lourie on September 22-23, 2007. The defense vehemently argues against a sexual offender registration requirement, claiming it was based on a 'misunderstanding' from a September 12 meeting where they were allegedly told by prosecutors Krischer and Belohlavek that the charge was not registrable. The document contains excerpts from emails where the defense calls the registration a 'life sentence' and pleads for reconsideration.
DOJ-OGR-00021221.jpg
This legal document details the early stages of the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in July and August 2006. It highlights the internal communication dynamics, showing investigator Villafaña bypassing her immediate supervisor to report directly to a senior management team in Miami, including Sloman and Acosta. The document also reveals the FBI's distrust of the local State Attorney's Office, fearing leaks to Epstein, and describes the initial evidence-gathering efforts, which included flight manifests and victim interviews.
DOJ-OGR-00021217.jpg
This legal document details a May 2006 meeting where the lead Palm Beach Police Department detective presented the state's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein to FBI and USAO representatives. The detective expressed concerns that pressure from Epstein's attorneys was compromising the state case and that Epstein may have been tipped off about a search warrant. The group discussed potential federal charges based on Epstein's use of a private plane for interstate travel with suspected underage girls, though evidence was not yet firm.
DOJ-OGR-00003284.jpg
This document details the intense plea negotiations over the weekend of September 22-23, 2007, specifically focusing on the defense team's (Sanchez, Lefkowitz) attempts to avoid sex offender registration for Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argued there was a 'misunderstanding' at a prior meeting and that registration would preclude Epstein from serving his time in a federal camp, which was their primary goal for his safety. The document also includes a footnote indicating State Attorney Krischer faced pressure from Police Chief Reiter regarding the case.
DOJ-OGR-00003223.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the initial federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in July-August 2006. It highlights the distrust federal prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman) held toward the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, fearing leaks to Epstein. It also details the unusual reporting structure where 'Miami' senior management took direct authority, bypassing local supervisors, and notes the FBI's collection of flight manifests and victim testimony despite intimidation tactics by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00003219.jpg
This document details a May 2006 meeting where the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) presented the Epstein case to federal authorities (FBI and USAO/Villafaña) due to concerns that the State Attorney (Krischer) was bowing to pressure from Epstein's legal team. The report outlines obstruction tactics used by Epstein's defense, including hiring PIs to trail police, orchestrating conflicts of interest to remove aggressive prosecutors, and potentially obtaining tips about search warrants. It also discusses the legal strategy for federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2423, citing flight logs listing anonymous 'females' as potential evidence of interstate trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00032921.jpg
This Palm Beach Police incident report from April 2006 details the acceptance of a plea deal by Jeffrey Epstein and his attorney, Guy Fronstin, resulting in the cancellation of a Grand Jury. The reporting officer expresses strong disapproval of the deal and frustration that the police were not consulted. The report also documents a conflict between the police and the State Attorney's Office regarding who was responsible for notifying the victims that the Grand Jury had been cancelled.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019196.jpg
This document is page 80 from a James Patterson book detailing the Palm Beach Police Department's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes a police search of Epstein's home where officers found Alison's high school transcript and noted the presence of non-relative young women, specifically naming Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova. The text highlights Chief Reiter's suspicion that the house had been 'scrubbed' or tidied up before the police arrived, suggesting Epstein had been tipped off.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019152.jpg
This document is a scanned page (p. 36) from a James Patterson book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight Committee evidence files. The text describes the early, quiet phases of Chief Reiter's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, noting how rumors began to spread through Palm Beach society. It details a specific event on September 11 where a girl named Alison was stopped by police (possibly for drug possession/dime bag) and subsequently provided information linking her to Jeffrey Epstein, similar to another victim named Mary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019151.jpg
This document appears to be pages 34 and 35 from a book (possibly a true crime account like 'Filthy Rich'), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text describes September 11, 2005, when the local NBC affiliate WPTV received an anonymous phone tip from a nervous boy about a 'prostitution ring' in Palm Beach involving local high school girls. It also references the media landscape in Palm Beach, including the Palm Beach Daily News and Chief Reiter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019144.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight Committee records. It details the recruitment of a Palm Beach sanitation worker named Noel St. Pierre by Chief Reiter and the Palm Beach PD to conduct a 'trash pull' operation to collect evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's garbage on El Brillo Way. The text describes St. Pierre's background, his route in the 'Estate Section,' and the specific instructions to set aside trash bags from the target residence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019141.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (Chapter 9) presented as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on the testimony of a victim named 'Mary' regarding a sexual assault involving a massage table and a vibrator. The text describes the assignment of Officer Pagan and a team of detectives to the 'predator case,' and chronicles a controlled telephone call orchestrated by police between Mary and an associate named Wendy Dobbs on March 31.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019140.jpg
This document is a scanned page (Chapter 9, page 24) from a book included in House Oversight records. It details a March 2005 police interview conducted by Officer Michele Pagan with a victim named Mary. Mary vividly describes an encounter with a 'white-haired' Epstein who was naked on a massage table, noting specific physical details. The partially visible text on the right page explicitly mentions sexual acts involving Mary's vagina and discusses a subsequent 'controlled call' to a woman named 'Wend[y]' as part of the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019135.jpg
This document is a scanned page (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019135) from the book 'Filthy Rich'. It details the atmosphere of Palm Beach under Police Chief Reiter, contrasting the wealthy social season with the tragedy of Haitian refugees washing ashore. It specifically notes that several 9/11 hijackers, including Mohamed Atta, lived in Palm Beach County and frequented a local nightclub called 251 Sunrise, which was closed in 2004.
Handling of the case
Questioned the unusual course of the investigation and suggested Krischer disqualify himself.
Condition of Epstein's home
Stating the house appeared to have been cleaned up prior to the search.
Conduct of the case
Complaining of the state's 'highly unusual' conduct and asking him to remove himself from the case.
Case handling
Letter regarding the effect of the investigation/warrants.
Unknown
Letter had no perceptible effect.
Handling of the matter
Questioning the unusual course of the office's handling and suggesting disqualification
Handling of Epstein Case
Questioned the unusual course of the case handling and suggested Krischer disqualify himself.
Investigation Case
Multiple calls ignored by Krischer.
Handling of the Epstein case investigation
Chief Reiter wrote to Mr. Krischer questioning 'the unusual course that your office's handling of this matter has taken' and suggesting that Krischer disqualify himself.
Handling of the Epstein case investigation
Chief Reiter wrote to Mr. Krischer questioning 'the unusual course that your office's handling of this matter has taken' and suggesting that Krischer disqualify himself.
Handling of the case
Questioning the unusual course of the office's handling and suggesting disqualification.
Criticism of FBI Referral
Criticized referral to FBI, claimed victims were not believable, stated 'Palm Beach solves its own problems.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity