This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 covering February 23, 2021, to March 18, 2021. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bond, the Government's opposition to it, and various scheduling orders regarding pretrial motions. A significant order on March 18, 2021, addresses the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically denying the Government's request to completely seal 'Exhibit 11' because portions of the transcript are already public record in the *Giuffre v. Maxwell* civil case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the legal proceedings, filing motions for bond and pretrial motions.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge issuing orders and endorsements.
|
| Bobbi Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Lawyer for Maxwell, filing motions for bond and replies.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Lawyer for Maxwell, filing letter motions for time extensions.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters and opposition motions.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA |
Prosecutor listed on government filings.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA |
Prosecutor listed on government filings.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA |
Prosecutor listed on government filings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA / The Government |
Opposing Maxwell's motions for bond and pretrial motions.
|
"The Court denies the Governments request to file Exhibit 11 entirely under seal."Source
"While portions of that transcript have been redacted, other portions are part of the public record. See Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15–cv–7433, Dkt. No. 1212–1."Source
"In light of this, the Court sees no basis to file the transcript entirely under seal rather than by redacting the relevant portions."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,442 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document