DOJ-OGR-00009349.jpg
422 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
422 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of a witness named Brune by Ms. Davis. The testimony centers on a conversation at Foley Square and whether a Ms. Edelstein asked to see a 'suspension opinion.' There is a legal dispute regarding a question about Ms. Trzaskoma informing Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue on May 12th, with the defense objecting to the accuracy of the date and the prosecution arguing they are permitted to lead an adverse witness.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Under direct examination, identified as an adverse party
|
| Mr. Schectman | Attorney |
Raising objections regarding dates and leading questions
|
| Ms. Davis | Attorney |
Questioning the witness, citing rule 611(c)
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections and clarifying arguments
|
| Ms. Edelstein | Subject of inquiry |
Questioned whether she asked to see a suspension opinion
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Subject of inquiry |
Allegedly told Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue
|
| Mr. Schoeman | Recipient of info |
Recipient of information from Ms. Trzaskoma
|
| Mr. Berke | Recipient of info |
Recipient of information from Ms. Trzaskoma
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (2 events)
May 12th
Alleged communication regarding a suspension issue involving Ms. Trzaskoma, Mr. Schoeman, and Mr. Berke.
Unspecified
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a conversation discussed in testimony
|
Relationships (3)
Communicated regarding suspension issue
Communicated regarding suspension issue
Key Quotes (4)
"Now we're back to the conversation on Foley Square?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009349.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you know whether Ms. Edelstein asked to see the suspension opinion?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009349.jpg
Quote #2
"You do know, don't you, though, that on May 12th, Ms. Trzaskoma told not the Court about the suspension issue but Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke, correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009349.jpg
Quote #3
"Your Honor if I might, 611(c) allows us to lead with a witness identified as an adverse party."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009349.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,362 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 60 of 130
A-5745
A-5745
288
C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct
1 found prior to voir dire?
2 A. Now we're back to the conversation on Foley Square?
3 Q. I'm just asking a question, I'm not putting a date on it.
4 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, it would be helpful if we had a
5 date.
6 Q. I don't know the answer so I'm going to ask the broad
7 question.
8 A. Okay.
9 Q. At the time, around the time before the verdict came in --
10 A. Okay, that's helpful.
11 Q. Do you know whether Ms. Edelstein asked to see the
12 suspension opinion?
13 A. I don't think that she did, but I don't know one way or the
14 other. She certainly didn't in the conversation on Foley
15 Square that we've been talking about.
16 Q. You do know, don't you, though, that on May 12th, Ms.
17 Trzaskoma told not the Court about the suspension issue but
18 Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke, correct?
19 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I object. I don't think the
20 date is accurate. I think it's leading. I mean, I don't
21 object to much leading, but the date's not accurate.
22 MS. DAVIS: Your Honor if I might, 611(c) allows us to
23 lead with a witness identified as an adverse party.
24 THE COURT: He's not objecting to leading. He's
25 objecting to leading with an erroneous assumption or statement
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009349
C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct
1 found prior to voir dire?
2 A. Now we're back to the conversation on Foley Square?
3 Q. I'm just asking a question, I'm not putting a date on it.
4 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, it would be helpful if we had a
5 date.
6 Q. I don't know the answer so I'm going to ask the broad
7 question.
8 A. Okay.
9 Q. At the time, around the time before the verdict came in --
10 A. Okay, that's helpful.
11 Q. Do you know whether Ms. Edelstein asked to see the
12 suspension opinion?
13 A. I don't think that she did, but I don't know one way or the
14 other. She certainly didn't in the conversation on Foley
15 Square that we've been talking about.
16 Q. You do know, don't you, though, that on May 12th, Ms.
17 Trzaskoma told not the Court about the suspension issue but
18 Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke, correct?
19 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I object. I don't think the
20 date is accurate. I think it's leading. I mean, I don't
21 object to much leading, but the date's not accurate.
22 MS. DAVIS: Your Honor if I might, 611(c) allows us to
23 lead with a witness identified as an adverse party.
24 THE COURT: He's not objecting to leading. He's
25 objecting to leading with an erroneous assumption or statement
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009349
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document