This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues to the Judge that the government is unfairly introducing new facts late in the process, depriving the defense of a written response. Cohen then pivots to defending his client's character, explicitly stating she is 'not Epstein' and not a 'monster,' emphasizing her strong family and professional support network present on the call anonymously for safety reasons.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court, arguing on behalf of his client, complaining about government procedure regarding late facts.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, instructing Mr. Cohen to respond to facts immediately.
|
| Epstein | Deceased Sex Offender (Referenced) |
Referenced by Mr. Cohen to distinguish his client from him ('our client is not Epstein').
|
| The Client | Defendant |
Referring to Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context of Case 21-770 and Epstein reference). Described as having a large...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Company responsible for transcribing the proceeding.
|
|
| The Government |
Accused by Mr. Cohen of 'dribbling out facts' late in the process.
|
|
| Media |
Accused of portraying the client as a 'monster'.
|
"I also want to make clear that our client is not Epstein."Source
"She is not the monster that has been portrayed by the media and now the government."Source
"We have a proceeding now where the government is dribbling out facts or what they claim are facts"Source
"She is part of a very large and close family, with extensive familial relations, extensive friendships, extensive professional relationships."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,699 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document