| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jill Greenfield
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
The Narrator
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the firm
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the firm
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the firm
|
Unknown |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
other Clients
|
Unknown |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Initial plea bargain negotiation | State level (implied Florida) | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Final Plea Bargain / Sentencing | Federal/State Court | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Period of alleged conduct mentioned in indictment | Unspecified | View |
This document is a page from a legal services agreement detailing the terms of arbitration, cost sharing, and confidentiality between a law firm and its clients. It defines 'Joint Expenses' versus 'Individual Expenses' and outlines the process for allocating these costs among clients involved in similar cases. The document also includes a waiver of rights to a trial by judge or jury in favor of binding arbitration.
This document is a page from a legal retainer agreement (Bates EFTA00037140) outlining terms between a law firm and a client. It covers the firm's authorization to practice law in various states (NY, MI, PA, CA, FL, DC), a disclosure of liability insurance, strict protocols regarding media communication, warnings about the discoverability of social media content, and consent for the use of cloud services and email. The document warns the client against destroying digital evidence.
This document is a chain of emails between Jill Greenfield (Partner at Fieldfisher law firm in London) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from September to October 2020, coordinates logistics for a US investigative team (including two AUSAs and two FBI agents) to travel to London to interview Greenfield's client. Key topics include obtaining travel authorization during the COVID-19 pandemic, securing quarantine waivers from the UK government, COVID-19 testing protocols, and the requirement to notify the London Metropolitan Police via the US Embassy.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and Jill Greenfield, a UK lawyer. They are negotiating the terms of an interview for Greenfield's client, a potential witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation who may have worked for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's non-suspect status, anonymity concerns, and the presence of a support person (a US lawyer friend) during the proposed London interview.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues for bail, claiming the government's indictment of conduct from 1994-1997 is tactical and lacks physical evidence like tapes or video. He asserts that the client has been kept in custody 'by design' and references the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues to the Judge that the government is unfairly introducing new facts late in the process, depriving the defense of a written response. Cohen then pivots to defending his client's character, explicitly stating she is 'not Epstein' and not a 'monster,' emphasizing her strong family and professional support network present on the call anonymously for safety reasons.
A transcript from an April 2021 court hearing where defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues for the release of his client (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on bail. Cohen cites the Bail Reform Act, the difficulty of preparing a defense during the COVID crisis while in custody, and explicitly argues that his client is 'not Jeffrey Epstein' and is being unfairly portrayed by the government and media as a 'sinister person.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity