HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
1.13 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Deposition transcript / legal proceeding
File Size:
1.13 MB
Summary
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931). Mr. Simpson questions a witness about the seriousness of accusing an adult of sex with a minor and the harm caused by false allegations to victims' rights. The questioning specifically focuses on the witness's previous statements and inferences regarding allegations that Professor Dershowitz engaged in misconduct.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney / Questioner |
Conducting the examination of the witness regarding allegations.
|
| The Witness | Deponent |
Answering questions regarding inferences made about Professor Dershowitz.
|
| Professor Dershowitz | Subject of Inquiry |
Mentioned in the context of allegations of misconduct.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
Witness is being questioned about their inferences that Dershowitz engaged in alleged conduct.
Key Quotes (4)
"Would you agree with me that accusing a person of -- an adult of engaging in sex with a minor is a serious accusation?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
Quote #1
"And would you agree with me that the cause of victims' rights is harmed and not furthered by false allegations of sexual abuse?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
Quote #2
"You drew in your answer a lot of inferences based on the facts or information you -- you recited, inferences that Professor Dershowitz had engaged in the conduct alleged"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
Quote #3
"I think part of it was -- was inference, part of were the facts."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (985 characters)
108
1 I'm sure it's probably --
2 THE WITNESS: It's all right.
3 MR. SIMPSON: That's okay with you?
4 THE WITNESS: Sure.
5 BY MR. SIMPSON:
6 Q. Would you agree with me that accusing a
7 person of -- an adult of engaging in sex with a minor is
8 a serious accusation?
9 A. Sure.
10 Q. And would you agree with me that the cause of
11 victims' rights is harmed and not furthered by false
12 allegations of sexual abuse?
13 A. Sure.
14 Q. I want to go back. I'm going to follow up on
15 some aspects of your answer.
16 A. Sure.
17 Q. Kind of work my way through some of those.
18 A. Sure.
19 Q. But first let me -- let me ask this: You
20 drew in your answer a lot of inferences based on the
21 facts or information you -- you recited, inferences that
22 Professor Dershowitz had engaged in the conduct alleged;
23 is that fair to say?
24 A. I think part of it was -- was inference, part
25 of were the facts. I mean, you say a lot of inferences.
1 I'm sure it's probably --
2 THE WITNESS: It's all right.
3 MR. SIMPSON: That's okay with you?
4 THE WITNESS: Sure.
5 BY MR. SIMPSON:
6 Q. Would you agree with me that accusing a
7 person of -- an adult of engaging in sex with a minor is
8 a serious accusation?
9 A. Sure.
10 Q. And would you agree with me that the cause of
11 victims' rights is harmed and not furthered by false
12 allegations of sexual abuse?
13 A. Sure.
14 Q. I want to go back. I'm going to follow up on
15 some aspects of your answer.
16 A. Sure.
17 Q. Kind of work my way through some of those.
18 A. Sure.
19 Q. But first let me -- let me ask this: You
20 drew in your answer a lot of inferences based on the
21 facts or information you -- you recited, inferences that
22 Professor Dershowitz had engaged in the conduct alleged;
23 is that fair to say?
24 A. I think part of it was -- was inference, part
25 of were the facts. I mean, you say a lot of inferences.
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document