DOJ-OGR-00009422.jpg
445 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (testimony)
File Size:
445 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness by Mr. Schoeman. The testimony details a conversation between the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma while walking across Foley Square, concerning Juror No. 1 (Ms. Conrad). They discussed a disbarred lawyer with the same name as the juror but concluded it was a different person because the juror's educational background did not include law school.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | Attorney/Questioner |
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
|
| Witness | Witness |
Answering questions regarding conversations about a juror. (Name not explicitly stated on this page, but is the 'A' i...
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Attorney/Colleague |
Person the witness had a conversation with regarding Juror No. 1.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Juror |
Identified as Juror No. 1; subject of the discussion regarding a name match with a disbarred lawyer.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Alias for Ms. Conrad.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune firm |
Law firm mentioned in relation to potential discussions about the juror.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| US District Court |
Implied by the case number and 'Southern District' reference.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Prior to testimony
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location in New York City where the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma were walking.
|
|
|
Street in New York City the witness was walking towards.
|
Relationships (2)
Walking together discussing case details/jurors; witness asked about discussions with anyone at the 'Brune firm' implying they might be associated.
Text refers to 'Ms. Conrad, Juror No. 1'.
Key Quotes (3)
"She told me that there was a person with the same name as -- I don't recall whether she said Juror No. 1 or Ms. Conrad, but a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer but that it was not the same person as Juror No. 1."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009422.jpg
Quote #1
"She anticipated that question as I was speaking it and said something to the effect that her educational background did not include law school."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009422.jpg
Quote #2
"I said, then it's not the same person? And she said right."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009422.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,489 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-3 Filed 02/24/22 Page 33 of 117
A-5818
A-5818
361
C2grdau4 Schoeman - direct
1 Q. Sometime after the reading of the note from Juror No. 1,
2 did you speak to Ms. Trzaskoma about Ms. Conrad, Juror No. 1?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Would you tell the Court what was said between you and Ms.
5 Trzaskoma at that time.
6 A. Yes. I recall that we had a conversation. I believe it
7 was as we were walking across Foley Square towards Duane
8 Street. She told me that there was a person with the same name
9 as -- I don't recall whether she said Juror No. 1 or Ms.
10 Conrad, but a person with the same name who was a disbarred
11 lawyer but that it was not the same person as Juror No. 1.
12 I began formulating a question to say, how do you
13 know? She anticipated that question and said, because of the
14 voir dire. I began formulating the question of, what question
15 during the voir dire would have disclosed that? She
16 anticipated that question as I was speaking it and said
17 something to the effect that her educational background did not
18 include law school. I said, then it's not the same person?
19 And she said right. By that time we had finished crossing the
20 street.
21 Q. Any further discussion about Juror No. 1?
22 A. Not with Ms. Trzaskoma during that time period.
23 Q. Any further discussion with anyone at the Brune firm
24 regarding Juror No. 1 during that time period?
25 A. No.
C2grdau4 Schoeman - direct
1 Q. Sometime after the reading of the note from Juror No. 1,
2 did you speak to Ms. Trzaskoma about Ms. Conrad, Juror No. 1?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Would you tell the Court what was said between you and Ms.
5 Trzaskoma at that time.
6 A. Yes. I recall that we had a conversation. I believe it
7 was as we were walking across Foley Square towards Duane
8 Street. She told me that there was a person with the same name
9 as -- I don't recall whether she said Juror No. 1 or Ms.
10 Conrad, but a person with the same name who was a disbarred
11 lawyer but that it was not the same person as Juror No. 1.
12 I began formulating a question to say, how do you
13 know? She anticipated that question and said, because of the
14 voir dire. I began formulating the question of, what question
15 during the voir dire would have disclosed that? She
16 anticipated that question as I was speaking it and said
17 something to the effect that her educational background did not
18 include law school. I said, then it's not the same person?
19 And she said right. By that time we had finished crossing the
20 street.
21 Q. Any further discussion about Juror No. 1?
22 A. Not with Ms. Trzaskoma during that time period.
23 Q. Any further discussion with anyone at the Brune firm
24 regarding Juror No. 1 during that time period?
25 A. No.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009422
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009422
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document