DOJ-OGR-00004743.jpg
716 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal mandate / court order
File Size:
716 KB
Summary
Mandate issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on June 7, 2021, affirming the District Court's orders denying bail to Ghislaine Maxwell. The court denied her motion for bail or temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, which the appellate court directed back to the District Court.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant-Appellant |
Appealing district court orders denying bail; AKA Sealed Defendant 1
|
| Pierre N. Leval | Circuit Judge |
Judge present at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
|
| Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. | Circuit Judge |
Judge present at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
|
| Richard J. Sullivan | Circuit Judge |
Judge present at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
|
| Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
Signed the mandate for the court
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Issued the mandate affirming the lower court's decision
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
USDC SDNY; Court where original orders were filed
|
|
| United States of America |
Opposing party in the case
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (4 events)
2020-12-28
2021-03-22
District Court order denying renewed request for bail (referenced)
USDC SDNY
Ghislaine Maxwell
District Court
2021-04-27
Date of the stated term/decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
2021-06-07
Mandate Issued affirming District Court's denial of bail
New York, NY
United States Court of Appeals
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the court term was held
|
Relationships (1)
Case caption: United States of America, Appellee, v. Ghislaine Maxwell... Defendant-Appellant
Key Quotes (3)
"it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail... is DENIED."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004743.jpg
Quote #1
"During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004743.jpg
Quote #2
"To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004743.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,640 characters)
MANDATE Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 299 Filed 06/07/21 Page 1 of 1 20-cr-330(AJN)
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: June 07, 2021
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: June 07, 2021
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 27th day of April, two thousand twenty-one.
PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL,
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
United States of America,
Appellee,
v.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
Appellee,
v.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial. See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
A True Copy
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
[Signature of Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe]
MANDATE ISSUED ON 06/07/2021
DOJ-OGR-00004743
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
[Signature of Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe]
MANDATE ISSUED ON 06/07/2021
DOJ-OGR-00004743
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document