DOJ-OGR-00021053.jpg
559 KB
Extraction Summary
11
People
10
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (table of authorities)
File Size:
559 KB
Summary
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing dated February 28, 2023. It lists various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main brief, including 'Doe v. Indyke et al.,' which directly references Darren Indyke, a known associate and executor for Jeffrey Epstein. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Indyke | Defendant |
Cited in case 'Doe v. Indyke et al.' (Darren Indyke was Jeffrey Epstein's long-time lawyer and executor of his estate).
|
| Doe | Plaintiff |
Cited in case 'Doe v. Indyke et al.'
|
| Fulminante | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Arizona v. Fulminante'
|
| Brazeail | Plaintiff (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Brazeail v. State'
|
| Bridges | Plaintiff (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Bridges v. U.S.'
|
| Apfel | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in 'E. Enterprises v. Apfel'
|
| Egbert | Plaintiff (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Egbert v. Boule'
|
| Boule | Defendant (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Egbert v. Boule'
|
| Gall | Plaintiff (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Gall v. United States'
|
| Garcia | Plaintiff (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Garcia v. U.S.'
|
| Giglio | Plaintiff (Case Law) |
Cited in 'Giglio v. United States'
|
Organizations (10)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
|
| Appalachian Power Co. |
Party in cited case law
|
|
| E.P.A. |
Environmental Protection Agency, party in cited case law
|
|
| Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms |
Party in cited case law
|
|
| Fed. Labor Relations Auth. |
Federal Labor Relations Authority, party in cited case law
|
|
| Eli Lilly Do Brasil, Ltda. |
Party in cited case law
|
|
| Fed. Express Corp. |
Party in cited case law
|
|
| Enterprise Mortg. Acceptance Co., LLC |
Party in cited case law
|
|
| Food & Drug Admin. |
FDA, party in cited case law
|
|
| Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. |
Party in cited case law
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-02-28
Filing of Document 59 in Case 22-1426
Unknown Court (likely Federal Appellate based on case number format)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,180 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page6 of 113
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page(s)
Cases:
Appalachian Power Co. v. E.P.A.,
249 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 2001)............................................................................54
249 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 2001)............................................................................54
Arizona v. Fulminante,
499 U.S. 279 (1991)............................................................................................64
499 U.S. 279 (1991)............................................................................................64
Brazeail v. State,
821 So. 2d 364 (Fla. App. 2002) ........................................................................28
821 So. 2d 364 (Fla. App. 2002) ........................................................................28
Bridges v. U.S.,
346 U.S. 209 (1953)......................................................................................46, 47
346 U.S. 209 (1953)......................................................................................46, 47
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth.,
464 U.S. 89 (1983)..............................................................................................55
464 U.S. 89 (1983)..............................................................................................55
Doe v. Indyke et al.,
Case No. 1:21-cv-08469-PKC (S.D. Fla.)..........................................................35
Case No. 1:21-cv-08469-PKC (S.D. Fla.)..........................................................35
E. Enterprises v. Apfel,
524 U.S. 498 (1998)............................................................................................60
524 U.S. 498 (1998)............................................................................................60
Egbert v. Boule,
142 S. Ct. 1793 (2022)........................................................................................23
142 S. Ct. 1793 (2022)........................................................................................23
Eli Lilly Do Brasil, Ltda. v. Fed. Express Corp.,
502 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2007) .................................................................................28
502 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2007) .................................................................................28
Enterprise Mortg. Acceptance Co., LLC, Securities Litig. v.
Enterprise Mortg. Acceptance Co.,
391 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2004) ................................................................53, 55, 58, 61
Enterprise Mortg. Acceptance Co.,
391 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2004) ................................................................53, 55, 58, 61
Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.,
529 U.S. 120 (2000)............................................................................................55
529 U.S. 120 (2000)............................................................................................55
Gall v. United States,
552 U.S. 38 (2007)..............................................................................................82
552 U.S. 38 (2007)..............................................................................................82
Garcia v. U.S.,
469 U.S. 70 (1984)..............................................................................................57
469 U.S. 70 (1984)..............................................................................................57
Giglio v. United States,
405 U.S. 150 (1972)......................................................................................19, 20
405 U.S. 150 (1972)......................................................................................19, 20
v
DOJ-OGR-00021053
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document