This document is a Notice of Compliance filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman) on July 28, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It addresses a court order regarding the preservation of evidence and a protective order, noting that while the parties agreed on many sections, they could not finalize a joint order, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order separately. The document lists numerous related civil cases involving Jane Doe plaintiffs and provides a comprehensive service list of attorneys involved in the various Epstein-related litigations at that time, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in multiple civil cases, submitting Notice of Compliance regarding a court order.
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 3 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 5 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 6 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 7 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| C.M.A. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Robert D. Critton, Jr. | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
| Stuart S. Mermelstein | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases (Mermelstein & Horowitz)
|
| Adam D. Horowitz | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases (Mermelstein & Horowitz)
|
| Brad Edwards | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 (Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler)
|
| Richard Horace Willits | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Attorney |
Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
|
| Jack Scarola | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. (Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley)
|
| Jack P. Hill | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. (Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley)
|
| Isidro M. Garcia | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant (Related Case) |
Mentioned as client of Bruce Reinhart in service list
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 (Podhurst Orseck)
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 (Podhurst Orseck)
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Attorney at Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss
|
| Theodore J. Leopold | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804 (Ricci-Leopold)
|
| Spencer T. Kuvin | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804 (Ricci-Leopold)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned attorneys, in compliance with the Court's Order (DE #192) hereby submits a proposed order on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (DE #114)"Source
"The Court granted the Plaintiffs Motion for an Order for Preservation of Evidence, (DE #192). However the Court determined that the Plaintiffs proposed order was overly broad and directed that the parties attempt to submit an agreed order."Source
"The parties have worked diligently to provide an agreed order, and have reached common ground on many sections. However, we were unable to finalize an order."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (6,031 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document