Fort Lauderdale
LocationRelationship Network
068.pdf
This document is a Mandate from the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida, dated September 18, 2009, regarding the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The mandate follows an opinion issued on September 2, 2009, where the court affirmed the lower court's decision, treating Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal. The document lists numerous attorneys involved, including R. Alexander Acosta on the distribution list, and identifies Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. as an appellee alongside the State and a redacted party.
014-02.pdf
This document contains notices for the videotaped deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel (spelled Bruhnel in one instance), scheduled for November 3, 2009, at Esquire Court Reporters in West Palm Beach, Florida. The deposition is relevant to two civil cases pending in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County: B.B. v. Jeffrey Epstein and L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists numerous attorneys involved in the litigation, including Spencer Kuvin, Bradley Edwards, Jack Goldberger, and Bruce Reinhart.
014-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and a Subpoena issued by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. It commands Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, at Esquire Court Reporters in New York City. The subpoena was issued by Brad Edwards, attorney for the plaintiff.
078.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on June 14, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The notice, filed by attorney Spencer T. Kuvin on behalf of Plaintiff C.L., withdraws a subpoena and cancels the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, which was scheduled for the following day, June 15, 2010. The document also includes a certificate of service listing legal counsel for various parties involved in related cases.
069.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by Igor Zinoviev, a third-party witness and employee of Jeffrey Epstein, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein'. Zinoviev claims he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment with Epstein began in November 2005, after the period of the alleged misconduct, and he has not discussed Epstein's criminal or civil cases with him.
050.pdf
This document is a Notice of Compliance filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman) on July 28, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It addresses a court order regarding the preservation of evidence and a protective order, noting that while the parties agreed on many sections, they could not finalize a joint order, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order separately. The document lists numerous related civil cases involving Jane Doe plaintiffs and provides a comprehensive service list of attorneys involved in the various Epstein-related litigations at that time, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
030.pdf
This document is a Notice of Withdrawing Subpoena filed on June 14, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff C.L., represented by attorney Spencer T. Kuvin, withdrew a subpoena and cancelled the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, which had been scheduled for June 15, 2010. The document includes a certificate of service listing legal counsel for various parties involved in the primary case (Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein) and related cases.
027-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and an associated Subpoena filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON). Plaintiff Jane Doe, represented by attorney Brad Edwards of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, commanded Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, in New York City. The document contains the legal notice, the subpoena addressed to Bruhel at a New York address, and standard Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding subpoenas.
016.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, claims he has no relevant information regarding Epstein's criminal or civil cases, particularly concerning events prior to September 2005. The motion cites legal precedents regarding the scope of discovery and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c) to argue against the deposition.
039.pdf
This legal filing is a Motion to Compel submitted by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission regarding his net worth, asset transfers, and allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking of minors, which he had previously refused to answer by asserting Fifth Amendment privileges. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's blanket assertion of the privilege is improper and that he must provide a particularized justification for each refusal or face an adverse inference.
056.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on June 26, 2009, by the attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff argues against Epstein's motion to dismiss, specifically contesting his claim that multiple violations of sexual exploitation statutes should be merged into a single count with a single penalty. The response asserts that 18 U.S.C. § 2255 allows for separate civil remedies and damages (minimum $150,000) for each distinct violation of a predicate offense.
028-02.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
043.pdf
This document is a joint stipulation filed on June 12, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Juliette Bryant against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein for 60 days. The stay is requested to allow Bryant to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. Attorneys Sigrid McCawley (for Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for Defendants) signed the agreement.
EFTA00037874.pdf
An email dated August 26, 2019, with the subject 'Epstein victims', documenting two phone calls received by the sender. One call was from a woman claiming to be a victim seeking to speak with an agent regarding a meeting in NY, and the second call was from a woman requesting a flight change from Palm Beach to Fort Lauderdale to attend an event in NY.
EFTA00025125.pdf
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling an in-person interview/meeting for McCawley's client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]', to take place on March 4, 2020, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New York. The subject line references the 'Epstein investigation'.
EFTA00007401.pdf
This document contains a series of monthly T-Mobile phone bills for an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein, covering the period from September 2004 to August 2005. The bills itemize thousands of voice calls and text messages, detailing the date, time, duration, and city/location of the subscriber at the time of the call (Destination), though the actual phone numbers dialed are redacted. The records show frequent travel between Miami, New York, and Palm Beach, as well as specific trips to Charlotte Amalie (Virgin Islands) and international text messaging to Poland.
DOJ-OGR-00033160.tif
This document is an aircraft maintenance and flight log for a Bell 407 helicopter, tail number N491GM, owned by Air Ghislaine Inc. It details several flights piloted by 'Visoski' in August and September 2009, along with a daily inspection certification. The log also includes a maintenance record from June 2009 by Tropic Radio Inc. regarding an altitude reporting system test, signed by Monk B. Alsancho.
DOJ-OGR-00018153.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi (likely Juan Alessi) by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Alessi's previous testimony in 2016, conducted in Fort Lauderdale by Brad Edwards (Virginia Roberts' lawyer), regarding a person named 'Jane' and events in 1994 or 1995. Alessi claims in the current testimony that he may have confused 'two girls' during that previous deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00015996.jpg
This document is a flight log page from March and April 2001 documenting flights on Jeffrey Epstein's Gulfstream (N909JE) and a Cessna (N908GM). Significant entries show Virginia Roberts ('VR') traveling with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and scientist Marvin Minsky to Santa Fe on March 29, 2001. The log also lists numerous other passengers including Banu Kucukkoylu, Alexis Wallace, and Henry Jarecki, and includes a redacted name on the March 31st flight.
DOJ-OGR-00021205.jpg
This document outlines the professional histories and specific roles of several key figures from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) who were involved in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It details the career paths of Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, and Andrew C. Lourie within the USAO, describing their supervisory responsibilities, participation in meetings with defense counsel, and involvement in negotiating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text also notes the career transitions of former U.S. Attorney Acosta, including his recusal from the Epstein matter and subsequent roles as Secretary of Labor and university dean.
DOJ-OGR-00021202.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the organizational structure of federal law enforcement in the Southern District of Florida during a specific period. It identifies key leadership at the Department of Justice, including Attorney General Michael Mukasey, and details the jurisdiction, staffing, and office locations of the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the region. The text also notes that the FBI's West Palm Beach office handled the 'Epstein investigation'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019453.jpg
This document is page 6 of a report produced by CEFOTAJ, a non-profit organization. It details the geopolitical and economic relationship between the U.S. and Haiti, outlining significant financial aid contributions from the U.S. and World Bank donors between 1995 and 2008. The text analyzes Haiti's economic struggles prior to the 2010 earthquake, citing political instability and corruption, while also noting the country's openness to foreign banking and investment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022164.jpg
This document contains pages 266 and 267 from a book, likely a memoir by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the defense against Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell regarding sexual allegations and Prince Andrew. Page 266 features the narrator attacking the credibility of lawyers Edwards and Cassell. Page 267 (Chapter 67) details the profile of Scott Rothstein, a Fort Lauderdale lawyer running a Ponzi scheme who made large donations to politicians like McCain and Schwarzenegger.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138.jpg
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 240-241) from a book, likely by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight control number. It discusses the state of affairs in September 2014, noting that FBI investigations into Epstein appeared stalled, while recounting a 2008 legal motion filed by lawyer Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities. Dershowitz is quoted denying these allegations entirely.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022048.jpg
This document is a scan of pages 240-241 from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') produced as evidence for House Oversight. Chapter 63, set in September 2014, discusses the stalling FBI investigation into Epstein and recounts a 2008 legal motion filed by Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities, which Dershowitz denied.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity