DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
504 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
504 KB
Summary
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony concerns the chain of custody for a specific hard drive seized in July 2007. Flatley admits that when he received the evidence box containing three copies of the drive, the evidence tape was already broken and the box featured a xerox of a different hard drive on the front.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Flatley | Witness |
Under cross-examination regarding chain of custody of hard drives.
|
| Unnamed Attorney | Interrogator |
Female defense attorney conducting cross-examination (referred to as 'ma'am').
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Relationships (1)
Flatley testifies to receiving the box of drives.
Key Quotes (3)
"Q. It was already broken when you received the box? A. That is correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. And there was some indication that the drive had been seized in July of 2007; correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
Quote #2
"A. I have my thoughts of why that would be. [Regarding why a different hard drive was xeroxed on the front of the box]"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,218 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 264 1497
LC7Cmax2 Flatley - cross
LC7Cmax2 Flatley - cross
1 Q. And what you actually saw were three copies of that hard
2 drive; right?
3 A. That is correct.
4 Q. And there was no information about why there were three
5 copies of that same hard drive; correct?
6 A. No, ma'am.
7 Q. And, in fact, the three hard drives were in a box; correct?
8 A. Yes, ma'am. That's how I received them.
9 Q. And when they were in the box, the front of the box had a
10 xerox copy of another hard drive on the front; correct?
11 A. Yes, ma'am.
12 Q. You have no idea why there was a different hard drive
13 xeroxed on the front of the box; right?
14 A. I have my thoughts of why that would be.
15 Q. But you don't know?
16 A. But no one told me or conveyed to me why it was like that,
17 no.
18 Q. And there was evidence tape on the box; right?
19 A. Yes, ma'am.
20 Q. And you didn't break that evidence tape; correct?
21 A. Not for that one, no, ma'am.
22 Q. It was already broken when you received the box?
23 A. That is correct.
24 Q. And there was some indication that the drive had been
25 seized in July of 2007; correct?
2 drive; right?
3 A. That is correct.
4 Q. And there was no information about why there were three
5 copies of that same hard drive; correct?
6 A. No, ma'am.
7 Q. And, in fact, the three hard drives were in a box; correct?
8 A. Yes, ma'am. That's how I received them.
9 Q. And when they were in the box, the front of the box had a
10 xerox copy of another hard drive on the front; correct?
11 A. Yes, ma'am.
12 Q. You have no idea why there was a different hard drive
13 xeroxed on the front of the box; right?
14 A. I have my thoughts of why that would be.
15 Q. But you don't know?
16 A. But no one told me or conveyed to me why it was like that,
17 no.
18 Q. And there was evidence tape on the box; right?
19 A. Yes, ma'am.
20 Q. And you didn't break that evidence tape; correct?
21 A. Not for that one, no, ma'am.
22 Q. It was already broken when you received the box?
23 A. That is correct.
24 Q. And there was some indication that the drive had been
25 seized in July of 2007; correct?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013084
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document