A transcript page from a July 16, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Prosecutor Rossmiller argues that the previous non-prosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District of Florida and that current charges involve New York victims, distinct from previous conduct. The Judge interrupts to object to the minimization of 'statutory rape' with the word 'only'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rossmiller | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Arguing regarding the non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and New York victims.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Interjects to criticize the phrasing 'only statutory rape'.
|
| Mr. Weingarten | Defense Attorney |
Referenced by Rossmiller regarding arguments on 'old conduct'; asks to clarify a point at the end.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Jeffrey Epstein) |
Subject of the hearing regarding attendance assurance and filings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of Florida |
Referenced regarding the scope of the previous non-prosecution agreement.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the previous non-prosecution agreement.
|
|
|
Location of victims for one of the two indictment counts.
|
"THE COURT: I'm not sure I would refer to something as only statutory rape. The use of the word 'only' before 'statutory rape' I'm not sure sits well."Source
"MR. ROSSMILLER: ...the Southern District of Florida has represented in public filings that the nonprosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District of Florida..."Source
"MR. ROSSMILLER: ...one of the two counts of the indictment is predicated exclusively on New York victims."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,478 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document