DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg

587 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 587 KB
Summary

A transcript page from a July 16, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Prosecutor Rossmiller argues that the previous non-prosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District of Florida and that current charges involve New York victims, distinct from previous conduct. The Judge interrupts to object to the minimization of 'statutory rape' with the word 'only'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rossmiller Prosecutor/Government Attorney
Arguing regarding the non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and New York victims.
The Court Judge
Interjects to criticize the phrasing 'only statutory rape'.
Mr. Weingarten Defense Attorney
Referenced by Rossmiller regarding arguments on 'old conduct'; asks to clarify a point at the end.
The Defendant Defendant (Jeffrey Epstein)
Subject of the hearing regarding attendance assurance and filings.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District of Florida
Referenced regarding the scope of the previous non-prosecution agreement.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service listed in footer.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-07-16
Court hearing (likely bail hearing or arraignment) regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied by case number/context)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the previous non-prosecution agreement.
Location of victims for one of the two indictment counts.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Rossmiller Opposing Counsel Mr. Weingarten
Rossmiller rebuts Weingarten's arguments regarding the age of the conduct.

Key Quotes (3)

"THE COURT: I'm not sure I would refer to something as only statutory rape. The use of the word 'only' before 'statutory rape' I'm not sure sits well."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. ROSSMILLER: ...the Southern District of Florida has represented in public filings that the nonprosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District of Florida..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg
Quote #2
"MR. ROSSMILLER: ...one of the two counts of the indictment is predicated exclusively on New York victims."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,478 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20 Filed 07/16/19 Page 23 of 24 23
j782epsC kjc
1 that those victims weren't treated as badly as the parade of
2 horribles he has in mind. But for now the question is whether
3 the defendant's attendance can be assured.
4 And with respect to the nonprosecution agreement --
5 THE COURT: I'm not sure I would refer to something as
6 only statutory rape. The use of the word "only" before
7 "statutory rape" I'm not sure sits well. But go ahead.
8 MR. ROSSMILLER: And I agree, your Honor.
9 With respect to the actual substance, the Southern
10 District of Florida has represented in public filings that the
11 nonprosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District
12 of Florida, and we can litigate that in a motion to dismiss,
13 but it is simply not relevant here.
14 With respect to the statute of limitations,
15 Mr. Weingarten says that the conduct is old. He did not say
16 that that it is beyond the statute of limitations because it is
17 not.
18 And, finally, it is not the same conduct. Some of the
19 conduct overlaps. Some of the conduct does not. And in
20 particular, one of the two counts of the indictment is
21 predicated exclusively on New York victims.
22 So for all of those reasons, we just ask the court to
23 consider those responses as it awaits the defendant's filings
24 later this week.
25 MR. WEINGARTEN: Can I just make one point to clarify?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000428

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document