DOJ-OGR-00019643.jpg
306 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (conclusion page)
File Size:
306 KB
Summary
This is the conclusion page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing submitted on October 2, 2020, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The filing argues that the District Court's order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order should be affirmed. It is signed by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, and Metzner.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Audrey Strauss | Acting United States Attorney |
Signatory representing the United States of America, Southern District of New York
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory, Of Counsel
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory, Of Counsel
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory, Of Counsel
|
| Karl Metzner | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory, Of Counsel
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant (Implied) |
Mentioned in the context of 'Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order'
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction of the United States Attorney
|
|
| United States of America |
Party represented by the attorneys
|
|
| District Court |
Court that issued the order being defended
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by footer code DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-10-02
Submission of legal conclusion affirming the denial of Maxwell's motion
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the document was dated/submitted
|
Relationships (3)
Listed together as attorneys for the United States
Listed together as attorneys for the United States
Strauss is representing the US Government opposing Maxwell's motion
Key Quotes (1)
"The District Court's order denying Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order should be affirmed."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019643.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (500 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page36 of 37
30
CONCLUSION
The District Court's order denying Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order should be affirmed.
Dated: New York, New York
October 2, 2020
October 2, 2020
Respectfully submitted,
AUDREY STRAUSS,
Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York,
Attorney for the United States of America.
Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York,
Attorney for the United States of America.
LARA POMERANTZ,
MAURENE COMEY,
ALISON MOE,
KARL METZNER,
Assistant United States Attorneys,
Of Counsel.
MAURENE COMEY,
ALISON MOE,
KARL METZNER,
Assistant United States Attorneys,
Of Counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00019643
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document