DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg

708 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court motion/memorandum)
File Size: 708 KB
Summary

This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on January 25, 2021. The defense argues that Perjury Counts should not be joined with Mann Act Counts because the alleged false statements occurred during 2016 civil depositions regarding a defamation suit (involving Virginia Giuffre) and were not made to the FBI or a grand jury to thwart an existing investigation. The text references a purported conspiracy between Maxwell and Epstein from 1999-2002.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Accused of making false statements in depositions; arguing against joinder of charges.
Jeffrey Epstein Alleged Co-conspirator
Mentioned in relation to a 'purported conspiracy' from 1999-2002.
Virginia Giuffre Accuser/Plaintiff
Mentioned in relation to the civil defamation action and purported conspiracy.
Potamitis Case Law Reference
Referenced in legal citation (United States v. Potamitis) regarding joinder of offenses.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
The government
Opposing party in the legal filing.
FBI
Mentioned in the context of making false statements to agents.
Grand jury
Mentioned in the context of perjury investigations.
DOJ
Indicated in the footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (3 events)

1999-2002
Timeframe of purported conspiracy involving Epstein, Maxwell, and Giuffre
Unspecified
2016-04
Deposition in civil defamation action
Unspecified
2016-07
Deposition in civil defamation action
Unspecified

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Alleged Co-conspirators Jeffrey Epstein
Text mentions 'purported conspiracy with Epstein from 1999-2002'.
Ghislaine Maxwell Litigation Opponents/Accuser Virginia Giuffre
Text mentions conspiracy 'involving Ms. Giuffre' and a civil defamation action.

Key Quotes (4)

"The government does not allege that Ms. Maxwell lied to the grand jury or the FBI to derail its investigation into the conduct underlying the Mann Act Counts."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell made false statements in two depositions in an unrelated civil defamation action which occurred in April and July 2016."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg
Quote #2
"defamation action, which was based on Ms. Maxwell’s denial of a purported conspiracy with Epstein from 1999-2002 involving Ms. Giuffre."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg
Quote #3
"[I]n an effort to conceal her crimes, MAXWELL repeatedly lied when questioned about her conduct, including in relation to some of the minor victims described herein, when providing testimony under oath in 2016."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,076 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 120 Filed 01/25/21 Page 12 of 19
substantive crimes when the false declarations “concern the substantive offenses.” Potamitis,
739 F.2d at 791. Such cases typically involve situations where the defendant was aware that he
was being investigated and either lied to the grand jury or made false statements to law
enforcement officers in an effort to thwart the existing investigation into the other offenses with
which he was charged. See, e.g., id. at 789-90 (joinder of perjury, false statements, and
obstruction of justice counts proper where defendant made false statements to FBI agents and
perjured himself in the grand jury); see also id. at 791 (collecting cases).
Here, the circumstances are very different and joinder is not appropriate. The
government does not allege that Ms. Maxwell lied to the grand jury or the FBI to derail its
investigation into the conduct underlying the Mann Act Counts. Instead, it alleges that Ms.
Maxwell made false statements in two depositions in an unrelated civil defamation action which
occurred in April and July 2016. Moreover, although the government alleges that some of the
questions posed at the depositions related to some of the alleged victims in this case (Indictment
¶¶ 2, 8), the questions were tangential to the defamation action, which was based on Ms.
Maxwell’s denial of a purported conspiracy with Epstein from 1999-2002 involving Ms. Giuffre.
The alleged false statements underlying the Perjury Counts therefore do not “concern” the Mann
Act Counts and cannot be joined as part of a “common scheme or plan.” Potamitis, 739 F.2d at
791.
The government makes only a half-hearted, and ineffective, attempt to allege a
connection between the Perjury Counts and the Mann Act Counts sufficient to satisfy Rule 8(a).
Paragraph 2 of the Indictment alleges:
[I]n an effort to conceal her crimes, MAXWELL repeatedly lied when questioned
about her conduct, including in relation to some of the minor victims described
herein, when providing testimony under oath in 2016.
8
DOJ-OGR-00002290

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document