DOJ-OGR-00016836.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal proceeding
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of questioning a witness (indicated as 'Dubin' in the header) about media reports concerning flight logs. Ms. Moe clarifies that the official flight records in evidence are sealed/redacted and differ from public versions. Mr. Pagliuca argues that inaccurate media reports have influenced perceptions of his client (Maxwell) and that the witness can testify to these inaccuracies.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor / Government Attorney |
Argues that flight records in evidence are not public and are partly under seal/redacted.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Argues for the relevance of questioning the witness regarding inaccurate media reports about flight logs and his client.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge (likely Judge Alison J. Nathan based on case number AJN) questioning the defense's line of inquiry.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Mentioned Person |
Mentioned in context of the witness's travel with him.
|
| Dubin | Witness |
Name appears in the header 'Dubin - direct', implying this is during the testimony of Eva Dubin.
|
| My Client | Defendant |
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number and defense counsel), whom Pagliuca claims is being inaccurately ...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00016836
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court filing date for the transcript.
Southern District of New York (implied)
Relationships (2)
MR. PAGLIUCA mentions 'her travel with Mr. Epstein'.
Pagliuca refers to 'my client'.
Key Quotes (3)
"The entirety of the flight records in evidence are not public. That's the exact reason why portions of them are under seal and redacted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016836.jpg
Quote #1
"That media exposure has influenced other people and I believe, frankly, influenced other people, relative to my client, putting my client on flights saying my client did things."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016836.jpg
Quote #2
"Whatever it is from whatever source, there is flight records that show she went to the moon, you should ask her about it?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016836.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,561 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 107 of 197 2648
LCHCmax3 Dubin - direct
LCHCmax3 Dubin - direct
1 mean the flight records that are in evidence?
2 MS. MOE: That's not correct, your Honor. The
3 entirety of the flight records in evidence are not public.
4 That's the exact reason why portions of them are under seal and
5 redacted. So we're not talking about the same flight records.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I disagree, but the point is, we
7 had a live witness who reviewed what purported to be in the
8 media her travel with Mr. Epstein. That media exposure has
9 influenced other people and I believe, frankly, influenced
10 other people, relative to my client, putting my client on
11 flights saying my client did things. It is the exposure to
12 this information. This witness, I believe, will testify, and
13 has so indicated to the government, that what she viewed was
14 inaccurate information. That's the import of it.
15 THE COURT: So the theory is media defined broadly,
16 could be a blog, a tweet, contains any inaccurate information,
17 it is relevant to ask this witness as to the accuracy of that?
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: It is inaccurate as to her personally.
19 THE COURT: I understand. But let's say you pull from
20 some blog post, something perhaps inaccurate; relevant to ask
21 this witness?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: About her and flight records.
23 THE COURT: Whatever it is from whatever source, there
24 is flight records that show she went to the moon, you should
25 ask her about it?
2 MS. MOE: That's not correct, your Honor. The
3 entirety of the flight records in evidence are not public.
4 That's the exact reason why portions of them are under seal and
5 redacted. So we're not talking about the same flight records.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I disagree, but the point is, we
7 had a live witness who reviewed what purported to be in the
8 media her travel with Mr. Epstein. That media exposure has
9 influenced other people and I believe, frankly, influenced
10 other people, relative to my client, putting my client on
11 flights saying my client did things. It is the exposure to
12 this information. This witness, I believe, will testify, and
13 has so indicated to the government, that what she viewed was
14 inaccurate information. That's the import of it.
15 THE COURT: So the theory is media defined broadly,
16 could be a blog, a tweet, contains any inaccurate information,
17 it is relevant to ask this witness as to the accuracy of that?
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: It is inaccurate as to her personally.
19 THE COURT: I understand. But let's say you pull from
20 some blog post, something perhaps inaccurate; relevant to ask
21 this witness?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: About her and flight records.
23 THE COURT: Whatever it is from whatever source, there
24 is flight records that show she went to the moon, you should
25 ask her about it?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016836
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document