| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
unidentified speaker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutors and defense attorneys argue over the admissibility of questions regarding a witness's ('Jane') settlement negotiations, with the defense arguing it proves bias and the prosecution objecting under Rule 408. The Judge intercedes by citing *Manko v. United States*, suggesting that the civil settlement exclusion rule (Rule 408) may not apply in criminal prosecutions.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of questioning a witness (indicated as 'Dubin' in the header) about media reports concerning flight logs. Ms. Moe clarifies that the official flight records in evidence are sealed/redacted and differ from public versions. Mr. Pagliuca argues that inaccurate media reports have influenced perceptions of his client (Maxwell) and that the witness can testify to these inaccuracies.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity