HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765.jpg

1.28 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 1.28 MB
Summary

This document is an email chain from October 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) and Barry J. Cohen regarding the management of Epstein's aircraft. They discuss switching management companies from Jet Aviation to EJM, the status of a Gulfstream V ('GV') inspection, and the tax implications of depreciation, specifically referencing 'foreign travel preponderance' and new rules under the Trump administration. Epstein also inquires about renovations and the potential sale of 'the 5' (likely the Gulfstream V).

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey E. (Epstein) Sender/Recipient
Discussing plane management, tax rules, and sales using email jeevacation@gmail.com
Barry J. Cohen Sender/Recipient
Advisor discussing aircraft management companies and tax depreciation status
Melanie Spinella Recipient
CC'd on the email regarding plane management
Trump Mentioned
Mentioned by Jeffrey E. in context of 'new depreciation rules proposed'

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Jet Aviation
Aircraft management company currently being used
EJM (Executive Jet Management)
Aircraft management company being considered as an alternative
JEE
Entity mentioned in the legal disclaimer (Jeffrey E. Epstein)
House Oversight Committee
Source of document (implied by Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT)

Timeline (1 events)

2017-10-02
GV (Gulfstream V) Inspection
Unknown

Relationships (1)

Jeffrey E. Client/Advisor Barry J. Cohen
Cohen advising on aircraft management and tax implications; Epstein giving directives.

Key Quotes (5)

"new depreciation rules proposed under trump"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765.jpg
Quote #1
"GV is in inspection and going well."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765.jpg
Quote #2
"On depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765.jpg
Quote #3
"Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765.jpg
Quote #4
"where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,801 characters)

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM
To: Barry J. Cohen [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Plane management
new depreciation rules proposed under trump
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Barry J. Cohen [REDACTED] wrote:
GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?
On depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.
Are you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that.
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM
To: Barry J. Cohen [REDACTED]; Melanie Spinella [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Plane management
dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Barry J. Cohen [REDACTED] wrote:
Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?
Sent from my iPhone
--
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026765

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document