This document is page 86 of a legal deposition transcript (rough draft). The witness testifies that flight logs demonstrate a close association and travel history between Alan Dershowitz and Jeffrey Epstein. The witness then mentions becoming aware on December 30th that attorney David Boies had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts. At this point, attorney Mr. Simpson interrupts the testimony to raise an objection regarding a potential waiver of attorney-client privilege.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Witness | Deponent |
Testifying about flight logs and legal representation
|
| Mr. Dershowitz | Subject |
Mentioned as having close association and travel with Mr. Epstein based on flight logs
|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned as traveling with Mr. Dershowitz
|
| David Boies | Attorney |
Described as a 'preeminent lawyer' who agreed to represent Virginia Roberts
|
| Virginia Roberts | Client/Victim |
Represented by David Boies
|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney |
Interjects to object regarding privilege waiver
|
| Ms. McCawley | Attorney |
Participating in the deposition
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Participating in the deposition
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021909'
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced in relation to David Boies' reputation
|
"And so those flight logs showed, you know, again, close association and travel with -- with -- with Mr. Dershowitz, and Mr. Epstein."Source
"David Boies, had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts"Source
"I think we are going towards a waiver here."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,080 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document