This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Attorneys Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe argue before the Judge regarding the admissibility of questioning the witness about whether she explicitly told the FBI she wanted the perpetrator prosecuted in 2006 versus her internal desire for it to happen. The Judge rules that Menninger can ask if the witness wanted him prosecuted, but limits the scope regarding specific statements told to agents if those statements are absent.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Arguing regarding the scope of cross-examination and impeachment of the witness.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Objecting to the defense's line of questioning regarding what the witness told the FBI.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on the objection regarding the scope of questioning.
|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
The witness currently under cross-examination (identified in header), referred to as 'she' in the dialogue.
|
| Him | Subject of prosecution |
The individual the witness potentially wanted prosecuted (contextually Jeffrey Epstein).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Federal Bureau of Investigation; discussed regarding statements made to them.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp).
|
"Whether or not she told the FBI she wanted him prosecuted and asked them to do that and whether she, in fact, wanted that to happen."Source
"I think what she's proposing is impeaching her in the absence of a statement to the FBI."Source
"You can ask her, I suppose, if she wanted him prosecuted in 2006."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,036 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document