080.pdf
1.14 MB
Extraction Summary
23
People
12
Organizations
6
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal motion / court document
File Size:
1.14 MB
Summary
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, requesting a protective order to prevent his deposition in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, who worked as a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, argues he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment began after the alleged events and he never discussed the criminal or civil cases with Epstein.
People (23)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the case against Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the case, employer of Igor Zinoviev
|
| Igor Zinoviev | Third Party Witness |
Moves for a protective order, worked as a driver and bodyguard for Jeffrey Epstein since November 2005
|
| L.M. | Witness |
Mentioned in depositions
|
| E.W. | Witness |
Mentioned in depositions
|
| Judge Linnea Johnson | Judge |
Issued Omnibus Order on October 28, 2009, regarding scope of discovery
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein |
Attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, signed the motion and certificate of service
|
| Stuart S. Mermelstein | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Attorney for plaintiffs in related cases
|
| Adam S. Horowitz | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Attorney for plaintiffs in related cases
|
| Richard Horace Willits | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Attorney for plaintiff in related case 08-80811
|
| Richard H. Willits | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Attorney for plaintiff in related case 08-80811
|
| Jack Scarola | Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. |
Attorney for plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Jack P. Hill | Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. |
Attorney for plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Bruce Reinhart | Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen |
Attorney for Sarah Kellen
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart | Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen |
Attorney for Sarah Kellen
|
| Brad Edwards | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Attorney for plaintiff in related case 08-08993
|
| Paul O. Cassell | Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe |
Attorney for Plaintiff Jane Doe
|
| Isidro M. Garcia | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Attorney for plaintiff in related case 08-80469
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Attorney for plaintiffs in related cases 09-80591 and 09-80656
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Counsel for Plaintiffs |
Attorney for plaintiffs in related cases 09-80591 and 09-80656
|
| Theodore J. Leopold | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Attorney for plaintiff in related case 08-08804
|
| Spencer T. Kuvin | Counsel for Plaintiff |
Attorney for plaintiff in related case 08-08804
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant for whom Bruce Reinhart serves as counsel
|
Organizations (12)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA |
Court where the case is filed
|
|
| Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. |
Law firm representing plaintiffs
|
|
| Richard H. Willits, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff
|
|
| Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff
|
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. |
Law firm representing defendant Sarah Kellen
|
|
| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler |
Law firm representing a plaintiff
|
|
| Garcia Law Firm, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff
|
|
| Podhurst Orseck, P.A. |
Law firm representing plaintiffs
|
|
| Leopold, Kuvin, P.A. |
Law firm representing a plaintiff
|
|
| Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm representing defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
|
| Brown & Williamson Tobacco |
Cited in legal precedent (Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco)
|
|
| United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union |
Cited in legal precedent (Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union)
|
Timeline (2 events)
2005-11
Igor Zinoviev began employment with Jeffrey Epstein as a driver and bodyguard.
2009-10-28
Judge Linnea Johnson issued an Omnibus Order (DE #377) regarding the scope of discovery.
Court
Locations (6)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. (18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33160)
|
|
|
Address for Richard H. Willits, P.A. (2200 10th Avenue North, Suite 404, Lake Worth, FL 33461)
|
|
|
Addresses for Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. (2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33...
|
|
|
Address for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301)
|
|
|
Address for Paul O. Cassell (332 South 1400 E, Room 101, Salt Lake City, UT 84112)
|
|
|
Address for Leopold, Kuvin, P.A. (2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410)
|
Relationships (4)
Igor Zinoviev worked for Jeffrey Epstein as a driver and bodyguard since November 2005.
Jane Doe No. 2 is the plaintiff in the case against Jeffrey Epstein.
Jack Alan Goldberger is Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
Bruce Reinhart is Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen.
Key Quotes (3)
""[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits.""Source
080.pdf
Quote #1
"'[w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane on the theory that it might conceivably become so.'"Source
080.pdf
Quote #2
""[a] party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or discovery;""Source
080.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (7,130 characters)
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 1 of 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
Related cases:
08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994,
08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994,
08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
THIRD PARTY WITNESS, IGOR ZINOVIEW'S,
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoviev's, ("Mr. Zinoviev") by and through his
undersigned attorney, moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) for a protective
order regarding his deposition and as grounds therefore would state:
undersigned attorney, moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) for a protective
order regarding his deposition and as grounds therefore would state:
1. As reflected in the affidavit of Igor Zinoviev, attached as Exhibit A, he
works for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Mr. Epstein") as a driver and bodyguard. He did
not know Mr. Epstein before November of 2005. He first became employed by Mr.
Epstein in November of 2005.
works for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Mr. Epstein") as a driver and bodyguard. He did
not know Mr. Epstein before November of 2005. He first became employed by Mr.
Epstein in November of 2005.
2. Additionally, Mr. Zinoviev would testify as set forth on his affidavit, that
at no time has he discussed with Mr. Epstein any issues involving Mr. Epstein's criminal
case nor any of the cases or issues involved with civil plaintiffs.
at no time has he discussed with Mr. Epstein any issues involving Mr. Epstein's criminal
case nor any of the cases or issues involved with civil plaintiffs.
1
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 2 of 26
3. In many of the depositions, counsel for L.M. and E.W., has asked them as
witnesses to assume certain facts about which they have no knowledge, and he then asks
their opinions about certain facts. See Exhibit B -Epstein's Motion for Protective Order
to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions.
witnesses to assume certain facts about which they have no knowledge, and he then asks
their opinions about certain facts. See Exhibit B -Epstein's Motion for Protective Order
to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions.
4. There is no information which Mr. Zinoviev has relating to the facts and
circumstances surrounding any of the pending civil cases, in that none of their allegations
directed to Mr. Epstein extend beyond September of 2005. Therefore whatever
information Mr. Zinoviev may have, postdates that time.
circumstances surrounding any of the pending civil cases, in that none of their allegations
directed to Mr. Epstein extend beyond September of 2005. Therefore whatever
information Mr. Zinoviev may have, postdates that time.
5. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea Johnson noted in her
October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it
is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566,
1570 (11th Cir. 1992). ... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy
[in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow
zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane
on the theory that it might conceivably become so.' Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food &
Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997) (string
cite omitted)."
October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it
is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566,
1570 (11th Cir. 1992). ... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy
[in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow
zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane
on the theory that it might conceivably become so.' Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food &
Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997) (string
cite omitted)."
6. Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that, "[a] party or
any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court
where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect
a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or
expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or
discovery;"
any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court
where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect
a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or
expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or
discovery;"
2
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 3 of 26
7. As set forth in his affidavit, Mr. Zinoviev cannot possibly have any
knowledge or information that is presently germane to this action. Accordingly, the
Court should enter a protective order prohibiting his deposition.
knowledge or information that is presently germane to this action. Accordingly, the
Court should enter a protective order prohibiting his deposition.
WHEREFORE, third-party witness moves this court for a protective order
pursuant to Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that his deposition not take
place or the questioning be limited.
pursuant to Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that his deposition not take
place or the questioning be limited.
By:
_______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
_______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Rule 7.1 Certification
I hereby certify that counsel for the movant has conferred or attempted to confer
with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the
filing of this motion for protective order but has been unable to do so.
with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the
filing of this motion for protective order but has been unable to do so.
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is
being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in
the manner specified by CM/ECF on this ____ day of November, 2009
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is
being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in
the manner specified by CM/ECF on this ____ day of November, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
By:
_______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
Fax: 561-835-8691
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
_______________________________
JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 262013
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
Fax: 561-835-8691
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
3
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 4 of 26
Service List
Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein
Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
Adam S. Horowitz, Esq.
Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami, FL 33160
305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-0877
sm@sexabuseattorney.com
ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs
In Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
08-80994
Adam S. Horowitz, Esq.
Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami, FL 33160
305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-0877
sm@sexabuseattorney.com
ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs
In Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
08-80994
Richard Horace Willits, Esq.
Richard H. Willits, P.A.
2200 10th Avenue North
Suite 404
Lake Worth, FL 33461
561-582-7600
Fax: 561-588-8819
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80811
reelrhw@hotmail.com
Richard H. Willits, P.A.
2200 10th Avenue North
Suite 404
Lake Worth, FL 33461
561-582-7600
Fax: 561-588-8819
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80811
reelrhw@hotmail.com
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Jack P. Hill, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,
P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
561-686-6300
Fax: 561-383-9424
jsx@searcyvalley.com
jph@searcyvalley.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A.
Jack P. Hill, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,
P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
561-686-6300
Fax: 561-383-9424
jsx@searcyvalley.com
jph@searcyvalley.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A.
Bruce Reinhart, Esq.
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
250 S. Australian Avenue
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
250 S. Australian Avenue
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Brad Edwards, Esq.
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
401 East Las Olas Boulevard
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: 954-522-3456
Fax: 954-527-8663
bedwards@rraalaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-08993
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
401 East Las Olas Boulevard
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: 954-522-3456
Fax: 954-527-8663
bedwards@rraalaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-08993
Paul O. Cassell, Esq.
Pro Hoc Vice
332 South 1400 E, Room 101
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
801-585-5202
801-585-0833 Fax
cassell@law.utah.edu
Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
Pro Hoc Vice
332 South 1400 E, Room 101
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
801-585-5202
801-585-0833 Fax
cassell@law.utah.edu
Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
Isidro M. Garcia, Esq.
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-832-7137
Fax: 561-832-7137
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80469
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-832-7137
Fax: 561-832-7137
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-80469
Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
305-358-2800
Fax: 305-358-2382
rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
kezell@podhurst.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
305-358-2800
Fax: 305-358-2382
rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
kezell@podhurst.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
4
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 5 of 26
561-202-6360
Fax: 561-828-0983
ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
Fax: 561-828-0983
ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561-684-6300
Fax: 561-515-2610
skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-08804
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561-684-6300
Fax: 561-515-2610
skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
08-08804
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document