Igor
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lev Parnas
|
Co defendants |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Affiants |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Witness observer |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sheryll L. Mahoney
|
Affiant notary |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employer driver |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Seminar-POWER | Unknown | View |
| 2009-12-18 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Igor Zinoview (which he sought to prevent). | Unknown | View |
| 2009-12-18 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Igor Zinoview (contested). | Unknown | View |
| 2009-12-18 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Igor Zinoview. | Unspecified | View |
| 2009-11-09 | N/A | Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoviev's Motion for Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of L... | Southern District of Florid... | View |
| 2009-11-01 | N/A | Filing of Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoviev's Motion for Protective Order and Incorporated Memor... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Affidavit signed and notarized by Igor Zinoviev | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Attempted deposition of Epstein. Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, exited in a separate elev... | Deposition location | View |
| 2009-09-16 | N/A | Lobby Incident / Confrontation | Lobby of 250 Australian Ave... | View |
| 2009-09-16 | N/A | Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, exited the building via separate elevators after the depos... | Building containing deposit... | View |
| 2005-11-01 | N/A | Igor Zinoview began working for Jeffrey Epstein. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2005-11-01 | N/A | Start of Igor Zinoview's employment with Jeffrey Epstein. | Epstein residence | View |
| 2005-11-01 | N/A | Igor Zinoviev began employment with Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Igor Zinoviev began employment with Jeffrey Epstein as a driver and bodyguard. | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Igor Zinoviev became employed by Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Igor Zinoviev first employed by Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Igor Zinoview begins employment as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer. | Epstein Residence | View |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 22 of 22.pdf
This document contains court filings from September 2009 regarding a dispute over the deposition of 'Jane Doe No. 4' in the civil case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's attorney, Adam Horowitz, cancelled the deposition after an alleged intimidation incident where Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, crossed paths with the plaintiff in the building lobby. Epstein's legal team (Critton and Luttier) filed for sanctions, arguing the encounter was coincidental as Epstein was leaving his office (Florida Science Foundation, same building) to avoid the deposition. The document includes affidavits from Epstein and Zinoviev denying interaction, invoices for the cancelled deposition costs, and a 2008 plea conference transcript defining 'no contact' orders.
008.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
073.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on November 28, 2009, by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) in her civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview—Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer since November 2005—who sought to avoid being deposed by claiming he had no knowledge of relevant facts. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview must be deposed because he worked for Epstein during the active Palm Beach Police investigation (2005-2006) and likely possesses knowledge regarding activities at the Epstein residence, especially since Epstein himself invoked the Fifth Amendment.
069.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by Igor Zinoviev, a third-party witness and employee of Jeffrey Epstein, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein'. Zinoviev claims he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment with Epstein began in November 2005, after the period of the alleged misconduct, and he has not discussed Epstein's criminal or civil cases with him.
021.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to avoid deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claimed he had no relevant knowledge of Epstein's legal matters. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview worked for Epstein during the police investigation period and likely has relevant observations, regardless of whether he discussed legal matters with Epstein.
016.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, claims he has no relevant information regarding Epstein's criminal or civil cases, particularly concerning events prior to September 2005. The motion cites legal precedents regarding the scope of discovery and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c) to argue against the deposition.
055.pdf
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed on November 9, 2009, by Igor Zinoviev, a third-party witness and Jeffrey Epstein's driver/bodyguard since November 2005. Zinoviev seeks to prevent or limit his deposition, arguing he has no knowledge relevant to the civil cases as his employment with Epstein began after the alleged events, and he has not discussed Epstein's criminal or civil cases with him. The motion cites legal precedents on the scope of discovery and includes a list of attorneys involved in various related cases.
086.pdf
This document is a response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano on November 28, 2009, opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to prevent his deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claims he has no relevant knowledge of legal matters involving Epstein. The Plaintiff argues that because Zinoview worked for Epstein during the active police investigation (2005-2006), he likely possesses relevant information regarding activities at the Epstein residence, and that a complete bar on his deposition is legally unjustified.
080.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, requesting a protective order to prevent his deposition in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, who worked as a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, argues he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment began after the alleged events and he never discussed the criminal or civil cases with Epstein.
EFTA00026622.pdf
This document is a 'State of the Office' report (likely for 2019 despite the 2018 header) from the Public Corruption Unit of the SDNY. It summarizes significant cases from the year, most notably the sex trafficking charges against Jeffrey Epstein, his subsequent suicide at the MCC, and charges against the guards who failed to monitor him. It also details high-profile cases against Michael Avenatti for extortion and fraud, and Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman for campaign finance violations.
EFTA00025171.pdf
This document is a report from the Public Corruption Unit (likely SDNY) summarizing its work in 2018 and 2019. It details high-profile prosecutions including those of Michael Avenatti, Lev Parnas, Igor Fruman, and Jeffrey Epstein. The report specifically mentions charges against MCC officers for falsifying records related to Epstein's suicide and describes a hearing where Epstein's victims were allowed to address the court.
DOJ-OGR-00030299.tif
This document is the second page of an affidavit filed in the case 'Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein' on September 17, 2009. The affiant, Igor Zinoviev, states under oath that he did not see Mr. Epstein speak or gesture to anyone near the front door, nor did he himself speak with individuals at the main entrance. The affidavit was notarized by Sheryll L. Mahoney in Palm Beach County, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00030296.tif
This court document is an affidavit or declaration by Jeffrey Epstein related to a protective order and motion concerning his attendance at depositions for 'Jane Doe Nos. 2-8' in case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. Epstein states that on September 16, 2009, his attorneys instructed him not to attend the deposition in person, so he viewed it remotely via video feed from his home. After the deposition was assumed to have begun, Epstein left the building with his driver, Igor Zinoviev, and avoided interaction with two women, one he believed to be Jane Doe No. 4.
DOJ-OGR-00030275.tif
This document, a court filing from September 17, 2009, details the events surrounding an attempted deposition of Epstein that was ultimately cancelled. Epstein's attorneys initially decided he would not attend, but he later attempted to leave the building and watch via video feed, only to encounter the Plaintiff at the exit, leading to the deposition's cancellation due to the Plaintiff's distress.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022012.jpg
This document is a scanned page (Chapter 54, page 204) from a book detailing Jeffrey Epstein's jail time between 2008 and 2009 at the 'Stockade' under Sheriff Ric Bradshaw. It contrasts Epstein's treatment with polo mogul John Goodman and highlights Epstein's extensive visitor list, which included Nadia Marcinkova (over 70 visits), assistant Sarah Kellen, MMA fighter Igor Zinoviev, and a disbarred lawyer. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026550.jpg
This document appears to be a planning list or agenda for an event titled 'Seminar-POWER'. It lists high-profile individuals including Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Michael Ovitz. The document contains internal notes questioning the identity of an individual named 'Igor' and asking whether to add Ian Osborne to 'both seminar lists,' suggesting there was more than one seminar being organized. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010544.jpg
This document is a scanned book excerpt (Chapter 54, page 204) marked with a House Oversight footer, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration between 2008 and 2009. It contrasts Epstein's jail privileges with those of millionaire John Goodman, specifically highlighting the high frequency of personal visitors Epstein received, including Nadia Marcinkova (over 70 times), his assistant Sarah Kellen, and MMA fighter Igor Zinoviev. The text also references Sheriff Ric Bradshaw's defense of the jail conditions and includes fragmented text on the opposing page mentioning US Attorney Acosta and the irregular nature of Epstein's government agreement.
Affidavit denying knowledge
Zinoview claims Epstein never discussed legal matters with him.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity