DOJ-OGR-00000044.tif
40.5 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court filing
File Size:
40.5 KB
Summary
This document outlines the procedural background of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) from September 2007, where he agreed to plead guilty to state charges in Florida and serve an eighteen-month sentence, in exchange for the U.S. agreeing not to prosecute him for offenses from 2001-2007 and not to charge potential co-conspirators. It also highlights a legal inconsistency regarding the enforceability of such agreements across different circuit courts, referencing a motion to dismiss by Maxwell that would have been granted under different circumstances.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant (implied, subject of motion to dismiss) |
Maxwell's motion to dismiss would have been granted if she had been charged in at least four other circuits (plus the...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) |
Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea agreement ("NPA") with the United States Attorney's Office fo...
|
| [four named individuals] | Potential co-conspirators of Epstein |
The United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators o...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States |
Party to the Non-Prosecution Agreement, prosecutorial authority
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida |
Entered into NPA with Jeffrey Epstein
|
|
| Main Justice |
High-level representatives of the United States
|
|
| Eleventh Circuit |
Circuit court where Epstein's agreement was entered into
|
Timeline (3 events)
2001-2007
Offenses committed by Epstein that were under investigation in the Southern District of Florida.
Southern District of Florida
September 2007
Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea agreement (NPA) with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.
Southern District of Florida
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
State where Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges
|
|
|
Jurisdiction where the NPA was made and where offenses from 2001-2007 were investigated.
|
Relationships (2)
Jeffrey Epstein
→
entered into Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA)
→
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea agreement ("NPA") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.
The United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to [four named individuals].
Key Quotes (2)
""Maxwell's motion to dismiss would have been granted if she had been charged in at least four other circuits (plus the Eleventh, where Epstein's agreement was entered into). This inconsistency in the law by which the same promise by the United States means different things in different places should be addressed by this Court."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000044.tif
Quote #1
""[i]n consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and provide compensation in the manner described above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to [four named individuals].""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000044.tif
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,718 characters)
2
indictment was denied, her trial proceeded, and she
is now serving a 20 year sentence. In light of
the disparity in how the circuit courts interpret the
enforceability of a promise made by the "United
States," Maxwell's motion to dismiss would have
been granted if she had been charged in at least four
other circuits (plus the Eleventh, where Epstein's
agreement was entered into). This inconsistency in the
law by which the same promise by the United States
means different things in different places should be
addressed by this Court.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Entry of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
In September 2007, after an extended period of
negotiation with high-level representatives of the
United States that included Main Justice, Jeffrey
Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea
agreement ("NPA") with the United States Attorney's
Office for the Southern District of Florida. (App.24-
38). In return for pleading guilty to state charges in
Florida, receiving and serving an eighteen-month
sentence, and consenting to jurisdiction and liability
for civil suits under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, the United
States agreed not to prosecute Epstein in the Southern
District of Florida for the offenses from 2001-2007
then under investigation. In addition, after lengthy
negotiations, the United States agreed that "[i]n
consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty
and provide compensation in the manner described
above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms of
this agreement, the United States also agrees that it
will not institute any criminal charges against any
potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not
limited to [four named individuals]." (App.30-31).
DOJ-OGR-00000044
indictment was denied, her trial proceeded, and she
is now serving a 20 year sentence. In light of
the disparity in how the circuit courts interpret the
enforceability of a promise made by the "United
States," Maxwell's motion to dismiss would have
been granted if she had been charged in at least four
other circuits (plus the Eleventh, where Epstein's
agreement was entered into). This inconsistency in the
law by which the same promise by the United States
means different things in different places should be
addressed by this Court.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Entry of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
In September 2007, after an extended period of
negotiation with high-level representatives of the
United States that included Main Justice, Jeffrey
Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea
agreement ("NPA") with the United States Attorney's
Office for the Southern District of Florida. (App.24-
38). In return for pleading guilty to state charges in
Florida, receiving and serving an eighteen-month
sentence, and consenting to jurisdiction and liability
for civil suits under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, the United
States agreed not to prosecute Epstein in the Southern
District of Florida for the offenses from 2001-2007
then under investigation. In addition, after lengthy
negotiations, the United States agreed that "[i]n
consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty
and provide compensation in the manner described
above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms of
this agreement, the United States also agrees that it
will not institute any criminal charges against any
potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not
limited to [four named individuals]." (App.30-31).
DOJ-OGR-00000044
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document