Main Justice
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
USAO-SDFL
|
Professional governmental |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Southern District
|
Co negotiators |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Professional departmental |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal appeal | Epstein's attorneys appealed to Main Justice in an unsuccessful attempt to void the Non-Prosecuti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A 'global solution' agreement was reached involving a plea in state court for soliciting an under... | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations with Main Justice and Southern District | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Meeting with Geoff, the brass, MCC team, and visitors from Main Justice/FBI/IG | 8th floor library | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | MCC Visit | MCC (Metropolitan Correctio... | View |
| 2007-09-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution and plea agreement (NPA) with the United States At... | Southern District of Florida | View |
020.pdf
Transcript of the initial appearance and arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The government argues for pretrial detention, citing extreme flight risk due to wealth/private jets and danger to the community based on evidence found in his home (photos of minors) and potential witness tampering. The defense pleads not guilty, argues the conduct is 'ancient' (2002-2005), and claims a 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement covers the conduct; a full detention hearing is scheduled for July 11.
EFTA00029454.pdf
An internal Department of Justice email chain from July 2021 discussing an upcoming 'voluminous' FOIA release related to Epstein. The emails coordinate press handling between the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office and Main Justice, noting specific interest from the Attorney General's Office.
EFTA00029452.pdf
An email chain from July 1, 2021, between DOJ Main Justice and the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office regarding Epstein FOIA litigation. The correspondence coordinates the handling of press inquiries and confirms that a voluminous document production to 'the Times' (likely New York Times) is scheduled for the following day.
EFTA00028149.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and SDNY prosecutors in July 2019, shortly after Epstein's arrest. The correspondence primarily concerns the return of personal effects (cash, clothes) and the retention of electronic devices (phones, computers) seized during the arrest, with the government confirming they obtained a warrant to search the electronics. Significant discussion focuses on the protocol for reviewing these devices ('taint team') to protect attorney-client privilege and clarification regarding the recusal of the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and the involvement of the Northern District of Georgia.
EFTA00023388.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff regarding a FOIA disclosure related to Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence details an internal request to delay the document production by one week to verify that Noel and Thomas had satisfied the interview requirements of their Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs). The chain confirms that 'The Times' (NYT) consented to the delay, the Court granted it, and the staff coordinated a review of 'newsworthy' items in the production while deciding not to notify the Epstein Estate.
EFTA00020627.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 25, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The correspondence concerns the transfer of evidence, specifically 'staff memos and photos,' related to an 'incident involving Jeffrey Epstein earlier this week' (likely the July 23 suicide attempt). The MCC attorney requests a written email request in lieu of a subpoena to release the documents, and the USANYS official subsequently forwards the materials for a 'walled off AUSA review'.
EFTA00019346.pdf
This document is an email thread dated August 14, 2019, four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. It coordinates a meeting scheduled for the following day (August 15) between MCC leadership ('the brass'), the MCC team, and visiting officials from Main Justice (DOJ), the FBI, and the Office of the Inspector General (IG). The meeting was set to take place in the 8th floor library following an 'MCC visit'.
EFTA00019343.pdf
An email dated August 14, 2019, organizing a meeting for the following day regarding 'MCC/Epstein'. The meeting is requested by 'Geoff' and involves high-level officials from the MCC, Main Justice, FBI, and the Inspector General (IG), scheduled to take place in the 8th floor library following a visit to the MCC. This likely pertains to the immediate aftermath and investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's death.
EFTA00017787.pdf
An email thread from August 14, 2019, four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death, coordinating a meeting for the following day. The meeting involves 'Geoff', 'the brass', the 'MCC team', and representatives from 'Main Justice', the FBI, and the Inspector General (IG), indicating a high-level review or investigation taking place at the MCC. The meeting was scheduled for the 8th-floor library following a visit to the facility.
EFTA00015360.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2021 involving Audrey Strauss and other USANYS officials regarding an 'Epstein FOIA Update.' The discussion concerns a briefing and materials related to Main Justice and a FOIA response, specifically addressing whether more documents might be produced upon reconsideration based on a Court's perception. Strauss requests materials to review over the weekend.
EFTA00014902.pdf
This document is an Urgent Matter Report (UMR) from the USAO-SDNY dated June 29, 2021, detailing the imminent release of approximately 2,700 pages of Bureau of Prisons records to The New York Times following FOIA litigation. The release includes internal memos, psychological records showing Epstein received special treatment and manipulated staff, an autopsy report, and details regarding institutional failures at MCC. The documents were previously withheld due to the criminal prosecution of guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, which concluded with deferred prosecution agreements.
EFTA00013661.pdf
An email chain concluding with a formal letter from Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) to Alex [Acosta] (US Attorney). Lefkowitz argues against federal prosecution, claiming 'Main Justice' is not directing it and that it would be a 'novel application' of statutes. He cites witness testimony alleging women lied about their ages to Epstein and that the FBI pressured women to identify as victims. He requests a meeting to resolve the matter before a July 8 state court deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00000044.tif
This document outlines the procedural background of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) from September 2007, where he agreed to plead guilty to state charges in Florida and serve an eighteen-month sentence, in exchange for the U.S. agreeing not to prosecute him for offenses from 2001-2007 and not to charge potential co-conspirators. It also highlights a legal inconsistency regarding the enforceability of such agreements across different circuit courts, referencing a motion to dismiss by Maxwell that would have been granted under different circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00000659.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on September 3, 2019. Epstein's defense counsel argues to the judge that Epstein's suicide on August 10 was 'implausible' given the pending legal motions scheduled for August 12, including a bail appeal and document production requests. The counsel also asserts that the initial autopsy findings on August 11 were inconclusive and reiterates the defense stance that the New York prosecution violated the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
DOJ-OGR-00000420.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on July 16, 2019. Attorney Mr. Weingarten argues before the Court that the Florida nonprosecution agreement should stand, asserting that a plea deal cannot be undone simply because prosecutors failed to notify victims, provided the defendant fulfilled their obligations (prison time, restitution, registration). Weingarten emphasizes that voiding such deals would make it impossible for defense attorneys to negotiate future agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00000418.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on July 16, 2019, where a lawyer is speaking on behalf of their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer describes a past comprehensive legal agreement that included a plea, victim compensation, and a non-prosecution agreement from the federal government. The lawyer argues that since 2008, Mr. Epstein has led a law-abiding life under constant monitoring and that the current court case arises from litigation under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00021098.jpg
This legal document page describes the extensive, eight-month negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) starting in January 2007, contrasting it with a potential plea agreement that was also drafted. It emphasizes the deep involvement of multiple levels of the U.S. government, including the Department of Justice, the USAO for the Southern District of Florida, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, and the FBI, in the negotiation and approval process.
DOJ-OGR-00021758.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was intentionally drafted to provide immunity beyond the Southern District of Florida, evidenced by the removal of limiting language and its replacement with 'United States.' It also refutes the Government's claim that 'Main Justice' was not involved, citing OPR records showing Andrew C. Lourie (Deputy Assistant Attorney General) actively participated in negotiations from Washington, D.C. in September 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00021682.jpg
This legal document is a filing that refutes claims made by Maxwell regarding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing argues that Maxwell's assertion of senior-level Justice Department approval for the NPA is a mischaracterization of the record, stating that any review by offices like the Deputy Attorney General's occurred only after the NPA was signed and in response to Epstein's actions, and did not constitute an approval of the agreement itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021305.jpg
This legal document details communications from February and March 2008 between federal prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman, Oosterbaan) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Starr). The central conflict involves the scope of the CEOS section's review of the case, with the defense pushing for broader involvement from senior Department of Justice officials and expressing distrust in prosecutor Drew Oosterbaan. The prosecution team expresses frustration with the defense's tactics and concerns about delays, while internal communications reveal doubts about offering Epstein a plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00002974.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein was strictly limited to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). It cites a 2013 brief from the USAO-SDFL, an OPR Report, and Department of Justice guidelines to establish that the USAO-SDFL did not have the authority to, and did not intend to, prevent Epstein's prosecution in any other federal district. The central theme is that the NPA was not a 'global resolution' and did not provide nationwide immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00002973.jpg
This legal document details communications and events following the signing of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It reveals internal dissent within the Department of Justice, citing an OPR Report where official Oosterbaan described the NPA as overly advantageous to Epstein. The document also notes that Assistant Attorney General Fisher denied any role in reviewing or approving the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00002971.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) arguing that the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) was not involved in Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The Government asserts that communications between the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and SDNY were solely regarding an old civil lawsuit from the 1990s, not plea negotiations. The text refutes defense claims involving 'Main Justice' and provides context on an AUSA who left the SDNY in April 2007.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity