Event Details
May 12, 2011
Description
Ms. Trzaskoma considered the possibility that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theresa Trzaskoma | person | 92 | View Entity |
| Juror No. 1 | person | 133 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg
This document is an affidavit filed by David Parse on August 7, 2012, in the criminal case *USA v. Daugerdas et al.* (Case 1:09-cr-00581). In the affidavit, Parse attests that during jury selection, he heard attorney Theresa Trzaskoma mention a juror had the same name as a suspended attorney but dismissed it as a coincidence. Parse states he only learned later (after a motion for a new trial was filed) that the issue of the juror ('Conrad') actually being the suspended lawyer had surfaced prior to deliberations. Note: While this document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text strictly concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case and juror misconduct.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A phone call with the Court.
0015-07-01
A discussion about whether to bring information about a juror to the Court's attention, resulting in a decision not to do so and not to investigate further.
Date unknown • the park
A jury asked for a judge's clarification on legal terms ("willfully" and "knowingly") during deliberations regarding David Parse.
2011-05-24
David Parse was convicted on charges related to backdating, though the jury did not convict on the conspiracy charge.
2011-05-24
A question-and-answer session (likely a deposition or court testimony) where Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically whether two individuals with that name, one being 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion includes the role of Theresa Trzaskoma and the firm's awareness of information regarding Juror No. 1's identity and responses to voir dire.
2022-02-24 • Implied to be within the Southern District, possibly New York
The government conducted a Google search on Juror No. 1 after she received a letter.
Date unknown
An investigation into Juror No. 1, referenced in a July 21 letter.
Date unknown
On the third day of jury deliberations, Juror No. 11 needed an emergency medical procedure and was excused, replaced by an alternate, and the jury was instructed to restart deliberations.
2012-05-16
Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.
Date unknown • Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event