DOJ-OGR-00019392.jpg
686 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court notice (notice of defective filing)
File Size:
686 KB
Summary
A Notice of Defective Filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket 20-3061). The notice indicates that a letter submitted on behalf of the Appellant on September 23, 2020, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked on this page. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court Judge.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Debra Ann Livingston | Chief Judge |
Listed in header of US Court of Appeals document
|
| Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
Listed in header of US Court of Appeals document
|
| Nathan | DC Judge |
Referenced as the District Court Judge (likely Alison Nathan)
|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellee/Appellant |
Named in Short Title 'United States of America v. Maxwell'; referenced implicitly as the party on whose behalf the de...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Issuing court
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (District Court)
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer code DOJ-OGR)
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of DC Court
|
Relationships (1)
Case title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,058 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 53, 09/23/2020, 2937074, Page1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
CHIEF JUDGE
CHIEF JUDGE
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
CLERK OF COURT
Date: September 23, 2020
Docket #: 20-3061
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Docket #: 20-3061
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING
On September 23, 2020 the LETTER, on behalf of the APPELLANT, was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason(s):
______ Failure to submit acknowledgment and notice of appearance (Local Rule 12.3)
______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
______ Missing proof of service
______ Served to an incorrect address
______ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
______ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
______ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
______ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
______ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
______ Oversized filing (FRAP 27 (motion), FRAP 32 (brief))
______ Missing Amicus Curiae filing or motion (Local Rule 29.1)
______ Untimely filing
______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
______ Missing proof of service
______ Served to an incorrect address
______ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
______ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
______ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
______ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
______ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
______ Oversized filing (FRAP 27 (motion), FRAP 32 (brief))
______ Missing Amicus Curiae filing or motion (Local Rule 29.1)
______ Untimely filing
DOJ-OGR-00019392
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document