DOJ-OGR-00020497.jpg

1.29 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket sheet / legal case log
File Size: 1.29 MB

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the orders and filings listed in the docket.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge signing orders and receiving letters.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Filed a letter motion regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1.
Christian R. Everdell Defense Attorney
Filed letter motions regarding a Proposed Protective Order and affidavits.
Alison Moe Prosecutor (USA)
Filed a letter requesting time extension to respond to defense.
Alex Rossmiller Prosecutor (USA)
Filed a letter response and affidavit regarding the Protective Order.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
USA
Plaintiff/Government (United States of America) represented by DOJ attorneys.
The Court
Federal Court (implied SDNY) presided over by Judge Nathan.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-07-21
Court Order regarding non-party submissions
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
2020-07-23
Court Order denying Defense motion to prohibit extrajudicial statements but warning counsel to comply with rules.
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell Defense Counsel Government Counsel
2020-07-27
Memo Endorsement granting USA extension to respond and requiring meet and confer.
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Alison Moe

Relationships (4)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Pagliuca files motions on behalf of Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Christian R. Everdell
Everdell files motions and affidavits on behalf of Maxwell.
Alison Moe Employment/Representation USA
Moe files letters on behalf of the USA.
Alex Rossmiller Employment/Representation USA
Rossmiller files affidavits and responses on behalf of the USA.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court has received a significant number of letters and messages from non-parties that purport to be related to this case. These submissions are either procedurally improper or irrelevant to the judicial function."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020497.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court firmly expects that counsel for all involved parties will exercise great care to ensure compliance with this Court's local rules, including Local Criminal Rule 23.1, and the rules of professional responsibility."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020497.jpg
Quote #2
"Accordingly, it denies the Defendant's motion without prejudice. But the Court warns counsel and agents for the parties and counsel for potential witnesses that going forward it will not hesitate to take appropriate action in the face of violations of any relevant rules."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020497.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,370 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page11 of 92
| | 8/21/2020., Motions due by 12/21/2020) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/15/20)(jw) (Entered: 07/15/2020) |
|---|---|
| 07/21/2020 | 26 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court has received a significant number of letters and messages from non-parties that purport to be related to this case. These submissions are either procedurally improper or irrelevant to the judicial function. Therefore, they will not be considered or docketed. The Court will accord the same treatment to any similar correspondence it receives in the future. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/21/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 07/21/2020) |
| 07/21/2020 | 27 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated July 21, 2020 re: Local Criminal Rule 23.1 . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/21/2020) |
| 07/23/2020 | 28 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Defense has moved for an order "prohibiting the Government, its agents and counsel for witnesses from making extrajudicial statements concerning this case." Dkt. No. 27 at 1. The Court firmly expects that counsel for all involved parties will exercise great care to ensure compliance with this Court's local rules, including Local Criminal Rule 23.1, and the rules of professional responsibility. In light of this clear expectation, the Court does not believe that further action is needed at this time to protect the Defendant's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. Accordingly, it denies the Defendant's motion without prejudice. But the Court warns counsel and agents for the parties and counsel for potential witnesses that going forward it will not hesitate to take appropriate action in the face of violations of any relevant rules. The Court will ensure strict compliance with those rules and will ensure that the Defendant's right to a fair trial will be safeguarded. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/23/2020) (ap) (Entered: 07/23/2020) |
| 07/27/2020 | 29 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated July 27, 2020 re: Proposed Protective Order . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Proposed Protective Order))(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 07/27/2020) |
| 07/27/2020 | 30 AFFIDAVIT of Christian R. Everdell by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 07/27/2020) |
| 07/27/2020 | 31 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe dated July 27, 2020 re: requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter, filed July 27, 2020 Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 07/27/2020) |
| 07/27/2020 | 32 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 31 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe dated July 27, 2020 re: requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter, filed July 27, 2020. ENDORSEMENT: The Government's response to the Defense's letter is due by 5 p.m. on July 28, 2020. The Defense may file a reply by 5 p.m. on July 29, 2020. Before the Government's response is filed, the parties must meet and confer by phone regarding this issue, and any response from the Government must contain an affirmation that the parties have done so. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 7/28/2020. Replies due by 7/29/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/27/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 07/27/2020) |
| 07/28/2020 | 33 LETTER RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alex Rossmiller dated July 28, 2020 re: 29 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated July 27, 2020 re: Proposed Protective Order .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (proposed protective order))(Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/28/2020) |
| 07/28/2020 | 34 AFFIDAVIT of Alex Rossmiller by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/28/2020) |
| 07/29/2020 | 35 LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated July 29, 2020 re 29 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated July 27, 2020 re: Proposed Protective Order .. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 07/29/2020) |
DOJ-OGR-00020497

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document