This document is a page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. David Parse.' It records the opening of oral arguments regarding Parse's motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Defense attorney Paul Shechtman and prosecutors Nanette Davis and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. are present. While part of a larger batch of documents (indicated by the DOJ-OGR Bates stamp) often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text specifically concerns the trial of David Parse.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Parse | Defendant |
Present at counsel table for oral argument on motion for a new trial.
|
| Nanette Davis | Prosecutor (Government) |
Appearing for the United States government.
|
| Stanley J. Okula, Jr. | Prosecutor (Government) |
Appearing for the United States government.
|
| Paul Shechtman | Defense Attorney |
Attorney representing David Parse.
|
| Ali Feingold | Paralegal |
Paralegal working with Paul Shechtman on the matter.
|
| Justice O'Connor | Supreme Court Justice (Historical) |
Quoted by Shechtman regarding the Strickland case.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the oral argument.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case against David Parse.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated by Bates stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and the nature of the case.
|
|
|
Setting of the transcript.
|
"Case of United States of America v. David Parse."Source
"This is oral argument on the defendant Parse's motion for a new trial."Source
"there is only one issue here which is a question of ineffective assistance of counsel."Source
"Justice O'Connor once said that Strickland was the most cited case that she ever wrote..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,718 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document