DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg

964 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (trial testimony)
File Size: 964 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript from the trial 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of witness Catherine Conrad (also known as Catherine Rosa), focusing on her credibility, her indefinite suspension from the practice of law, her alcoholism, and her arrest for petit larceny in 2009. The testimony reveals she submitted inaccurate medical reports regarding her sobriety to support her petition for reinstatement to the bar.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Catherine M. Conrad Witness / Attorney (Suspended)
Being questioned about her law license reinstatement, alcoholism, and credibility. Admits to using the alias Catherin...
Catherine M. Rosa Alias
Alias used by Catherine Conrad socially and during an arrest for petit larceny.
Paul M. Daugerdas Defendant
Named in the case caption (United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas).
Dr. Warren Seligman Medical Professional
Wrote a report supporting Conrad's reinstatement to the bar, which contained inaccuracies about her abstinence.
Mr. Gair Attorney
Moves for the admission of evidence (Exhibit PMD 29).
Mr. Okula Attorney
States no objection to the evidence.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the testimony, ruling on objections.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Maxwell Institute
Treatment facility where the witness received care and was discharged negatively.
St. Vincent's
Medical institution associated with the Maxwell Institute.
Westchester Department of Community Mental Health
Source of a report (page 16-4) discussed in testimony.
Southern District Reporters
Court reporting service.
People of the State of New York
Plaintiff in a case against Catherine M. Rosa (Exhibit 29).

Timeline (5 events)

2009
Witness arrested for petit larceny under the name Catherine Rosa.
New York (implied)
Catherine Conrad (as Catherine Rosa)
August 2009
Witness kicked out of treatment program at Maxwell Institute for drinking.
Maxwell Institute
Catherine Conrad Maxwell Institute
February 15, 2012
Court testimony regarding reinstatement and credibility.
Courtroom
Catherine Conrad Mr. Gair The Court
February 28, 2011
Catherine Conrad submitted reinstatement papers to practice law.
Court
Catherine Conrad
October 2009
Maxwell Institute reported witness was negatively discharged.
Maxwell Institute
Maxwell Institute Catherine Conrad

Locations (2)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction for State of New York v. Catherine M. Rosa.
Location of the Department of Community Mental Health.

Relationships (2)

Catherine Conrad Alias Catherine Rosa
Witness admits to using the name socially and during an arrest.
Catherine Conrad Doctor/Patient Dr. Warren Seligman
Seligman wrote a report for Conrad's reinstatement.

Key Quotes (4)

"I was suspended indefinitely."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you sometimes go by the name of Catherine Rosa? A. Socially."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg
Quote #2
"When you were arrested for petit larceny in 2009, did you give the name to the police Catherine Rosa? A. Yes, sir."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg
Quote #3
"You submitted a report from Dr. Seligman that was inaccurate in that it said that you had been abstinent for 2 1/2 years when you had not been abstinent for 2 1/2 years?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,513 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 166-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 236 of 67
A-5654
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
[Page 177]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct
1 Q. Did you attempt to be reinstated to the practice of law
2 before February of 2011?
3 A. I submitted my reinstatement papers, which we have already
4 gone over, on February 28th, and they were signed on February
5 26th of 2011.
6 Q. Before that, though, you had tried to be reinstated a
7 couple of years earlier, right?
8 A. I was suspended indefinitely.
9 Q. You tried to be reinstated, saying that your alcoholism was
10 in remission, right?
11 A. The chronology of it is that you have to formally submit
12 the reinstatement documents, which happened on February 28,
13 2011. I did not submit any reinstatement documents before that
14 time.
15 Q. Let's go to this reinstatement petition, which is
16 Exhibit 21, which I believe is already in evidence. Can you
17 look at Exhibit 21. In particular I'd like you to look at
18 Exhibit 4 to that submission, which is a report from Dr. Warren
19 Seligman.
20 THE WITNESS: Judge, do I have to go through this in
21 open court?
22 THE COURT: Yes. I have ruled on that. I'm directing
23 you to answer. I overruled your counsel's application.
24 Q. Do you see Dr. Seligman's report?
25 A. Yes, sir.
[Page 178]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct
1 Q. You submitted this report as part of your petition for
2 reinstatement, correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Did you review the report before you submitted it?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Did you write the report or did he?
7 A. I think it was a combination of him and my attorney.
8 Q. Him and your attorney wrote the report?
9 A. Mm-hm.
10 Q. If you would look on the second page of Dr. Seligman's
11 report, it says near the bottom of the middle paragraph. "She
12 has taken the appropriate and effective actions to help
13 herself." Do you see that?
14 A. Which paragraph, sir?
15 Q. The middle paragraph, the third paragraph on the second
16 page.
17 A. Oh, yes.
18 Q. "She has taken the appropriate and effective actions to
19 help herself," correct?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. Then it says, "She has been abstinent for over 2 1/2 years and
22 has been committed to her recovery plan."
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Correct?
25 A. Yes.
[Page 179]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct
1 Q. 2 1/2 years before February of 2011 would have been --
2 A. August 2009.
3 Q. No, that would have been August 2008. 2 1/2 years before
4 February of 2011?
5 A. Yes, you're correct.
6 Q. You were not abstinent from August 2008 on, were you,
7 ma'am?
8 A. No.
9 Q. In fact, you got kicked out of a treatment program in
10 August 2009 because you were drinking, correct?
11 A. It was either 2008 or 2009. I'm not specifically certain
12 on that.
13 Q. Let's see if we can help you on that. Exhibit Number 29,
14 if you would.
15 MR. GAIR: Your Honor, I move the admission of PMD
16 number 29, which is a multipage document relating to a case
17 called the People of the State of New York v. Catherine M.
18 Rosa?
19 THE COURT: Any objection?
20 MR. OKULA: No objection, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: PMD Exhibit 29 is received in evidence.
22 (Exhibit PMD 29 received in evidence)
23 Q. Do you sometimes go by the name of Catherine Rosa?
24 A. Socially.
25 Q. When you were arrested for petit larceny in 2009, did you
[Page 180]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct
1 give the name to the police Catherine Rosa?
2 A. Yes, sir.
3 Q. If you look at page 4, a number at the lower right-hand
4 corner of the document says 16-4. It's a report from the
5 Westchester Department of Community Mental Health. Do you see
6 that?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. You were receiving treatment at the Maxwell Institute?
9 A. Yes. It was part of St. Vincent's, yes.
10 Q. Maxwell Institute reported in October of 2009 that you were
11 negatively discharged from the program in August 2009 due to
12 ongoing use of alcohol?
13 A. Yes, that's true.
14 Q. You were recommended for a higher level of care, correct?
15 A. That's what the report says.
16 Q. Were you recommended for a higher level of care?
17 A. No.
18 Q. You didn't get it, right, a higher level of care?
19 A. Clinically what do you mean?
20 Q. If you don't understand what I mean, I'll move on to
21 another question.
22 A. Thank you.
23 Q. You submitted a report from Dr. Seligman that was
24 inaccurate in that it said that you had been abstinent for 2 1/2
25 years when you had not been abstinent for 2 1/2 years?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS (45) Page 177 - Page 180
DOJ-OGR-00009258

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document