August 01, 2009
Witness kicked out of treatment program at Maxwell Institute for drinking.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Conrad | person | 154 | View Entity |
| Maxwell Institute | organization | 2 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg
This document is a transcript from the trial 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of witness Catherine Conrad (also known as Catherine Rosa), focusing on her credibility, her indefinite suspension from the practice of law, her alcoholism, and her arrest for petit larceny in 2009. The testimony reveals she submitted inaccurate medical reports regarding her sobriety to support her petition for reinstatement to the bar.
Events with shared participants
Letter from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua [sic], Esq.
2011-05-25
Certificate of Disposition for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad'.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.
Date unknown • Southern District
Date mentioned in a question regarding when information was gathered on Catherine Conrad at Theresa Trzaskoma's request.
0012-05-01
Certificate of Disposition issued for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad' from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
A letter was sent from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua, Esq.
2011-05-25
A pending disciplinary proceeding concerning Ms. Conrad's medical suspension held before the disciplinary committee of the First Judicial Department.
Date unknown • First Judicial Department
Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
2012-02-15 • courtroom
A jury had discussions and deliberations regarding David Parse, and struggled with the definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' for different counts, including conspiracy and tax evasion.
Date unknown
The Court read a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, during an afternoon session.
2011-05-11 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event