HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
1.9 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / government oversight document
File Size:
1.9 MB
Summary
An email chain from January 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and David Grosof discussing scientific topics such as probability, gravity, and biological signal encryption. Epstein mentions he is having dinner with 'Jin Watson' (likely James Watson), and Grosof references past meetings with Watson, Gunther Stent, Francis Crick, and Jonathan Victor. The document originates from a House Oversight investigation.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. (Jeffrey Epstein) | Sender/Participant |
Discussing physics, probability, and biology; mentions having dinner with 'Jin Watson'.
|
| David Grosof | Recipient/Participant |
Engaging in intellectual discussion with Epstein; asks clarifying questions about scientific theories.
|
| Jin Watson | Subject of discussion |
Likely James Watson (DNA scientist). Epstein mentions he is 'having dinnner with Jin Watson'. Grosof mentions meeting...
|
| Gunther Stent | Associate |
Mentioned by Grosof as the person through whom he met Watson.
|
| Crick | Associate |
Likely Francis Crick. Mentioned by Grosof as someone he met on another occasion.
|
| Jonathan Victor | Associate |
Mentioned by Grosof as someone Epstein met 'a few years ago in your office'; noted for work in neural coding.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
Location where David Grosof saw Watson talk about 4 years prior.
|
||
| House Oversight |
Government body labeled in the footer.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unknown (few years prior to 2017)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Book tour location mentioned.
|
|
|
Location where Epstein met Jonathan Victor a few years prior.
|
Relationships (3)
Extensive email chain discussing physics, biology, and mutual acquaintances.
Jeffrey Epstein
→
Social/Associate
→
Jin Watson (James Watson)
Epstein states he is 'having dinnner with Jin Watson'.
Grosof mentions Epstein met Victor 'a few years ago in your office'.
Key Quotes (5)
"probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
Quote #1
"fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
Quote #2
"all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
Quote #3
"Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
Quote #4
"Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,636 characters)
From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 1/20/2017 12:14:31 PM
To: David Grosof
Subject: Re: Your Special Day
Sent: 1/20/2017 12:14:31 PM
To: David Grosof
Subject: Re: Your Special Day
Importance: High
probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers . centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM, David Grosof <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Cool. And the former question, of clarification?
Cool. And the former question, of clarification?
Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone.
On Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM, "jeffrey E." wrote:
pretty well
pretty well
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM, David Grosof <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Probability as a force rather than a what?
Didn't suss out the next word...
Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion.
Know him well?
D.
Probability as a force rather than a what?
Didn't suss out the next word...
Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion.
Know him well?
D.
Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone.
On Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM, "jeffrey E." wrote:
1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that . 2. all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of , can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own enxruption de encyption algorithm built in. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson.
1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that . 2. all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of , can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own enxruption de encyption algorithm built in. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM, David Grosof <[REDACTED]> wrote:
At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote:
At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote:
all good.  thx.  areas of interest,    distribuitions in nature. .    2 deception. 3. sleep . 4. power. 5 money. 6 music and the brain. 7 , signal intellignece in the biologocal systems
Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!
The rest of the truncated message has been sent.
The rest of the truncated message has been sent.
1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the "distributions in nature" issue?
7. "Signal intelligence in biol. systems" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?
7. "Signal intelligence in biol. systems" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document