DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg

1.46 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket sheet / case log (us district court, sdny)
File Size: 1.46 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referencing SDNY Case 20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021, detailing proceedings in the case USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists filings related to various Motions in Limine regarding the exclusion of evidence (including items from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way), suppression of identification, and expert testimony. It also contains a court order establishing protocols for an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including COVID-19 measures and provisions for public and victim access via overflow rooms.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the motions and orders listed in the docket.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Signed the endorsement/order regarding public access and sealing.
Andrew Rohrbach Attorney (Prosecution)
Associated with the filing of the Memorandum in Opposition by the USA (Entry 452).
Jeffrey Pagliuca Attorney (Defense)
Associated with the filing of the Reply to Response (Entry 453).
Accuser-3 Alleged Victim
Mentioned in title of Motion 444 regarding exclusion of evidence.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Venue for the proceedings.
USA
Filed opposition memorandum.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cited in case title for Daubert standard.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (indicated in Bates stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

10/20/2005
Search of property
358 El Brillo Way
Law Enforcement
11/15/2021
In-person court proceeding
Courtroom 518, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse, NY
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Teams

Locations (4)

Location Context
Location of the in-person proceeding.
Main courtroom for the proceeding.
Overflow rooms for the public.
Address mentioned in motion regarding items seized during a search on October 20, 2005.

Relationships (3)

USA Adversarial (Prosecution vs Defendant) Ghislaine Maxwell
MEMORANDUM in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell
Andrew Rohrbach Legal Representation USA
Listed attorney for the USA filing
Jeffrey Pagliuca Legal Representation Ghislaine Maxwell
Listed attorney for the Defense filing

Key Quotes (4)

"The Court will ensure access for alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
Quote #1
"This District no longer permits public access by telephone for in-court criminal proceedings, including trials."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
Quote #2
"The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
Quote #3
"Motion in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,923 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page60 of 91
to seal portions of motions in limine, trial exhibits, public access. ENDORSEMENT:
The Court received the attached letters via email. This District no longer permits
public access by telephone for in-court criminal proceedings, including trials. The
memorandum can be found here - https://nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus.
The Courts public access orders for all proceedings in the case can be found here -
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/usa-vsghislaine-
maxwell-20-cr-330-ajn-caseinformation. The Court has implemented a procedure
for docketing filings with proposed redactions and is ruling on the proposals as
expeditiously as possible. See Dkt. No. 401. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison
J. Nathan on 11/12/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 | 452 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell re 449 MOTION in
Limine to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and
606., 444 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3., 447
MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification., 443 MOTION in Limine to Exclude
Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing., 448 MOTION in Limine
to Preclude Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony.,
445 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated
Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources., 442 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any
Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to
Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement., 446 MOTION in Limine to Exclude
Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005.,
441 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator
Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021
Order.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Rohrbach,
Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 | 453 | REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell re 449 MOTION in Limine
to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606., 444
MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3., 447 MOTION in
Limine to Suppress Identification., 443 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Under Federal
Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S.
579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing., 448 MOTION in Limine to Preclude
Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony., 445 MOTION
in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document
from Suspect Sources., 442 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by
the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the
Rule's Notice Requirement., 446 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly
Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005., 441 MOTION in
Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a
Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order..
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), # 3
Exhibit C (Filed Under Seal), # 4 Exhibit D (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit
E)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Main Document 453 replaced on 11/22/2021) (jw). (Entered:
11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 | 454 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As discussed at Wednesday's conference, the Court
will hold an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The proceeding
will take place in Courtroom 518 of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New
York, New York. In accordance with its prior Order, the Court will ensure access for
alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family. Dkt. No. 344. In order to
comply with the District's COVID-19 protocols, the public will be able to access the
proceeding in overflow Courtrooms 110 and 506 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S.
Courthouse. These overflow rooms will have live video and audio feeds of the
proceeding. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in the overflow
rooms is strictly prohibited. The Court anticipates seating capacity in the overflow
rooms for at least 50 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no additional
persons will be admitted. Per the S.D.N.Y. Response to COVID-19, anyone who
appears at any S.D.N.Y. courthouse must complete a questionnaire on the date of the
proceeding prior to entering the courthouse. All visitors must also have their
temperature taken when they arrive at the courthouse. Only persons who meet the
entry requirements established by the questionnaire and whose temperatures are below
100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter the courthouse. All visitors must wear a mask
DOJ-OGR-00020446

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document