EFTA00015880.pdf

60.2 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 60.2 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from December 2020 between officials at the US Attorney's Offices in New York (SDNY) and New Hampshire (USANH), the FBI, and the NYPD. The discussion concerns whether to extend the court seal on a 'Triggerfish' warrant (likely a cell-site simulator used for tracking) related to Ghislaine Maxwell in the District of New Hampshire (DNH). The officials agree that they cannot justify extending the seal and decide to let it lapse.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Subject of Investigation
Subject of the 'Triggerfish' warrant discussed in the emails.
Redacted Special Agent FBI Agent
Agent from FBI New York Field Office agreeing to the proposed action.
Redacted Senders/Recipients Government Officials
Personnel from USANYS, USANH, and NYPD discussing warrant sealing.

Locations (2)

Relationships (2)

USANYS Professional/Inter-agency USANH
Coordinating on the sealing of a warrant related to Ghislaine Maxwell.
FBI Professional/Law Enforcement NYPD
Included in the same email chain regarding the investigation.

Key Quotes (4)

"I do not think we can justify seeking extended sealing at this point"
Source
EFTA00015880.pdf
Quote #1
"do you need the seal on the DNH triggerfish warrant extended?"
Source
EFTA00015880.pdf
Quote #2
"The seal on this triggerfish is set to expire soon. Am I correct in assuming we can go ahead and let this lapse?"
Source
EFTA00015880.pdf
Quote #3
"Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell Triggerfish"
Source
EFTA00015880.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,829 characters)

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (NY) (FBI)" <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (NYPD)" <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Ghislaine Maxwell Triggerfish
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:05:19 +0000
Thanks very much to you both.
From: [Redacted] (NY) (FBI) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 1:57 PM
To: [Redacted] (NYPD) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Ghislaine Maxwell Triggerfish
I agree [Redacted]
Special Agent [Redacted]
FBI New York Field Office
On Dec 28, 2020 12:04 PM, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]> wrote:
I agree, thanks [Redacted].
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 10:58 AM
To: [Redacted] (NY) (FBI) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (NYPD) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell Triggerfish
See below. I do not think we can justify seeking extended sealing at this point, but let me know if you all disagree. The warrant materials are attached for reference.
From: [Redacted] (USANH) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:42 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANH) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell Triggerfish
[Redacted], do you need the seal on the DNH triggerfish warrant extended?
Merry Christmas to you and yours!
Mr. [Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANH) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 10:20 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANH) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell Triggerfish
[Page 2]
The seal on this triggerfish is set to expire soon.
Am I correct in assuming we can go ahead and let this lapse?
[Redacted]
EFTA00015881

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document