DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
539 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
539 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 16, 2019. The text details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorneys (Weingarten and Weinberg), and the prosecutor (Rossmiller) regarding the scheduling of a bail application hearing, moving it from Thursday to the following Monday at 10:00 AM. The prosecutor, Mr. Rossmiller, requests a moment to confer with the defense and subsequently states that the government will rely on its initial submission.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court (Judge RMB) | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, managing the schedule for bail applications.
|
| Mr. Weingarten | Defense Counsel |
Agreeing to the scheduling proposal.
|
| Mr. Weinberg | Defense Counsel |
Agreeing to the scheduling proposal.
|
| Mr. Rossmiller | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Requesting a moment to confer with defense counsel; stating the government's position on submissions.
|
| Magistrate Judge Pitman | Judge |
Mentioned by The Court regarding previous scheduling of written submissions.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Represented by Mr. Rossmiller.
|
|
| Defense Counsel |
Represented by Weingarten and Weinberg.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-16
Court hearing regarding obstruction discussions and scheduling of bail application.
Courtroom
Upcoming Monday at 10:00
Scheduled time for bail application hearing.
Courtroom
The Court
Counsel
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
Relationships (2)
Rossmiller asks to confer with 'defense counsel' (Weingarten/Weinberg).
Rossmiller speaks on behalf of 'the government'.
Key Quotes (4)
"In terms of bail application, it would be helpful, and maybe this is your anticipation, to file written submissions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
Quote #1
"What I'm getting to is Thursday afternoon is not a good time, in my opinion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
Quote #2
"Why don't we say Monday at 10:00."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
Quote #3
"Your Honor, the government is prepared to rely on its initial submission at least for its first argument."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,348 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 Filed 07/16/19 Page 15 of 18 15
1 couldn't because the facts didn't fit. That is my
2 understanding of how those obstruction discussions arose.
3 THE COURT: Got it.
4 In terms of bail application, it would be helpful, and
5 maybe this is your anticipation, to file written submissions.
6 If you could do that. What I'm getting to is Thursday
7 afternoon is not a good time, in my opinion. I would prefer to
8 do it, if you would go along with this, Monday morning at, say,
9 9:30. That would give everybody more time to make these
10 submissions and to study them. Is that agreeable?
11 MR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.
12 MR. WEINBERG: Yes.
13 THE COURT: Why don't we say Monday at 10:00. Have
14 you arranged written submissions on any time schedule with
15 Magistrate Judge Pitman?
16 MR. ROSSMILLER: May we have just a moment, your
17 Honor, with defense counsel?
18 THE COURT: Yes, would you. And also determine if one
19 party or the other is going first and that the other is
20 responding or they are simultaneous.
21 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
22 (Pause)
23 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, the government is
24 prepared to rely on its initial submission at least for its
25 first argument. I expect defense counsel will respond to that
1 couldn't because the facts didn't fit. That is my
2 understanding of how those obstruction discussions arose.
3 THE COURT: Got it.
4 In terms of bail application, it would be helpful, and
5 maybe this is your anticipation, to file written submissions.
6 If you could do that. What I'm getting to is Thursday
7 afternoon is not a good time, in my opinion. I would prefer to
8 do it, if you would go along with this, Monday morning at, say,
9 9:30. That would give everybody more time to make these
10 submissions and to study them. Is that agreeable?
11 MR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.
12 MR. WEINBERG: Yes.
13 THE COURT: Why don't we say Monday at 10:00. Have
14 you arranged written submissions on any time schedule with
15 Magistrate Judge Pitman?
16 MR. ROSSMILLER: May we have just a moment, your
17 Honor, with defense counsel?
18 THE COURT: Yes, would you. And also determine if one
19 party or the other is going first and that the other is
20 responding or they are simultaneous.
21 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
22 (Pause)
23 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, the government is
24 prepared to rely on its initial submission at least for its
25 first argument. I expect defense counsel will respond to that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000401
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document