DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg

584 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 584 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten requests an adjournment of a detention hearing until Thursday, which the Court grants. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller accepts the delay but provides a rebuttal argument, asserting that federal law charges trafficking rather than 'child prostitution' because children cannot consent to sex, and noting that force is not required for underage victims.

People (3)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the detention hearing and managing the schedule.
Mr. Weingarten Defense Attorney
Representing the defendant (Epstein), requesting an adjournment of the detention hearing.
Mr. Rossmiller Prosecutor (Government)
Representing the government, agreeing to adjournment but providing a rebuttal regarding charges of sex trafficking ve...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
The Government
Referred to by the Court; represented by Mr. Rossmiller.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00000427.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-07-16
Detention Hearing / Court Proceeding
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Weingarten Opposing Counsel Mr. Rossmiller
Weingarten represents defense, Rossmiller represents the government.

Key Quotes (4)

"Certainly the concept of child prostitution is, frankly, offensive and not recognized in federal law."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg
Quote #1
"The idea that children can consent to sex and be prostitutes is beyond the realm of federal law which contemplates trafficking, which is what has been charged here."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg
Quote #2
"there is simply no force required for underage victims."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg
Quote #3
"Mr. Weingarten is free to argue to a jury that trafficking minors was only statutory rape"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,471 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20 Filed 07/16/19 Page 22 of 24 22
j782epsC kjc
1 proveable. That is the answer to the obstruction issue.
2 THE COURT: All right. So you want to adjourn the
3 detention hearing until Thursday?
4 MR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.
5 THE COURT: All right. Is there any objection to that
6 from the government? I think under the statute he is entitled
7 to three days.
8 MR. ROSSMILLER: That is, of course, fine, your Honor.
9 I think we would like just a very brief opportunity to
10 respond to some of those arguments so that they don't sort of
11 hang with the court for three days unresponded to.
12 THE COURT: All right. Go ahead.
13 MR. ROSSMILLER: Just very briefly, your Honor, I
14 think a lot of that discussion was entirely orthogonal to the
15 issues here.
16 But just very briefly, with respect to the charges
17 here, there is simply no force required for underage victims.
18 A grand jury has properly returned an indictment, and these are
19 fact issues that are being presented in large part.
20 Certainly the concept of child prostitution is,
21 frankly, offensive and not recognized in federal law. The idea
22 that children can consent to sex and be prostitutes is beyond
23 the realm of federal law which contemplates trafficking, which
24 is what has been charged here. Mr. Weingarten is free to argue
25 to a jury that trafficking minors was only statutory rape or
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000427

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document