This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten requests an adjournment of a detention hearing until Thursday, which the Court grants. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller accepts the delay but provides a rebuttal argument, asserting that federal law charges trafficking rather than 'child prostitution' because children cannot consent to sex, and noting that force is not required for underage victims.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the detention hearing and managing the schedule.
|
| Mr. Weingarten | Defense Attorney |
Representing the defendant (Epstein), requesting an adjournment of the detention hearing.
|
| Mr. Rossmiller | Prosecutor (Government) |
Representing the government, agreeing to adjournment but providing a rebuttal regarding charges of sex trafficking ve...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referred to by the Court; represented by Mr. Rossmiller.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00000427.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.
|
"Certainly the concept of child prostitution is, frankly, offensive and not recognized in federal law."Source
"The idea that children can consent to sex and be prostitutes is beyond the realm of federal law which contemplates trafficking, which is what has been charged here."Source
"there is simply no force required for underage victims."Source
"Mr. Weingarten is free to argue to a jury that trafficking minors was only statutory rape"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,471 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document