DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
735 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court exhibit (table of extradition procedures)
File Size:
735 KB
Summary
This document is Page 26 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It contains a table summarizing procedural timelines and statutory rules under the UK's Extradition Act 2003, specifically detailing scenarios where a person consents to extradition versus those requiring a hearing. The document outlines the roles of the Secretary of State and the Extradition Judge in extending deadlines and ordering removal.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Secretary of State | Government Official (UK) |
Official responsible for receiving cases and ordering extradition.
|
| Extradition Judge | Judicial Officer |
Responsible for extending dates and managing extradition hearings.
|
| Requested Person | Subject of Extradition |
The individual who may consent to extradition or face a hearing.
|
| AJN | Judge (Initials in Case Number) |
Refers to Judge Alison J. Nathan, presiding over United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| Office of Government Relations (OGR) |
Likely indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| UK Parliament/Government |
Implied by references to the Extradition Act 2003.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-14
Document filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
US District Court (Southern District of New York)
Relationships (1)
Table outlines handoffs and timelines between the Secretary of State and the Extradition Judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"in the interests of justice"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
Quote #1
"where the requested person consents to extradition, the case is sent to the Secretary of State straight away"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
Quote #2
"the Secretary of State does not need to wait four weeks to consider any representations"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,979 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97-21 Filed 12/14/20 Page 26 of 29
Cases where the requested person consents to extradition
Sending the case to the Secretary of State
No statutory time-limit⁶
No statutory time-limit⁶
Comment [5]: in practice, where the requested person consents to extradition, the case is sent to the Secretary of State straight away
Order for extradition
Two months of the date on which the case is sent to the Secretary of State⁷
Two months of the date on which the case is sent to the Secretary of State⁷
Comment [6]: where the requested person consents to extradition, the Secretary of State does not need to wait four weeks to consider any representations from the requested person before ordering extradition: section 93(7)
Removal
28 days of the order for extradition⁸
28 days of the order for extradition⁸
Cases where there is an extradition hearing
The date of the extradition hearing (provisional arrest)
Two months from the date on which the Secretary of State sends the documents to the extradition judge. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be “in the interests of justice” to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once⁹
Two months from the date on which the Secretary of State sends the documents to the extradition judge. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be “in the interests of justice” to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once⁹
Comment [7]: in practice, the extradition judge often “opens” the extradition hearing at the initial hearing with the effect that this time-limit ceases to run
The date of the extradition hearing (arrest pursuant to a full request)
Two months from the initial hearing. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be “in the interests of justice” to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once¹⁰
Two months from the initial hearing. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be “in the interests of justice” to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once¹⁰
Comment [8]: in practice, the extradition judge often “opens” the extradition hearing at the initial hearing with the effect that this time-limit ceases to run
⁶ Extradition Act 2003, s. 128.
⁷ Extradition Act 2003, s. 99(3).
⁸ Extradition Act 2003, s. 117(2)(a).
⁹ Extradition Act 2003, s. 76(3)–(4).
¹⁰ Extradition Act 2003, s. 75(2)–(3).
⁷ Extradition Act 2003, s. 99(3).
⁸ Extradition Act 2003, s. 117(2)(a).
⁹ Extradition Act 2003, s. 76(3)–(4).
¹⁰ Extradition Act 2003, s. 75(2)–(3).
DOJ-OGR-00002121
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document