extradition judge
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Secretary of State
|
Procedural |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Analysis of the legal arguments and bars to the extradition of Ms Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal procedure | Arrest under a provisional warrant. The requested person must be brought before a judge 'as soon ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal procedure | Arrest pursuant to a full extradition request. The requested person must be brought before a judg... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Extradition proceedings concerning Ms Maxwell. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001207.jpg
This legal document analyzes the potential bars to the extradition of Ms. Maxwell from the UK to the US. It argues that bars related to oppression or human rights (Article 8 of the ECHR) are unlikely to be available to her, especially given that she absconded from the United States. The document also clarifies that the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 is not discretionary but is limited to specific statutory grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00002228.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Exhibit 103-2) dated December 23, 2020, analyzing UK extradition law in relation to Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that if Maxwell were to flee the US to the UK, she would likely be denied bail and her arguments against extradition (oppression, human rights) would fail due to 'bad faith' and the serious nature of the charges. It also clarifies the limited powers of the UK Secretary of State to refuse extradition under the Extradition Act 2003.
DOJ-OGR-00002228(1).jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a court filing from December 23, 2020, argues against the availability of certain bars to the extradition of Ms. Maxwell. It posits that a finding of oppression is unlikely given she absconded from the United States, and that human rights claims under the ECHR are also improbable. The document further clarifies that the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition is strictly limited by the Extradition Act 2003 and is not a matter of general discretion.
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
This document is Page 26 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It contains a table summarizing procedural timelines and statutory rules under the UK's Extradition Act 2003, specifically detailing scenarios where a person consents to extradition versus those requiring a hearing. The document outlines the roles of the Secretary of State and the Extradition Judge in extending deadlines and ordering removal.
DOJ-OGR-00002120.jpg
This document is an annex from a legal case, filed on December 14, 2020, which outlines the procedural stages and time limits for extradition requests from the United States to the United Kingdom under the Extradition Act 2003. It details the preliminary stages, including certification of the request and arrest procedures, providing commentary on practical timelines and the conditions under which bail is considered. The document references specific sections of the Extradition Act 2003 for each stage.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity