DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg
680 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court notice (notice of defective filing)
File Size:
680 KB
Summary
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 5, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The notice indicates that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted by the United States (Appellee) did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked in the visible list. The document lists Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as court officials.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Debra Ann Livingston | Chief Judge |
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
|
| Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
|
| Nathan | District Court Judge |
DC Judge listed for SDNY (likely Alison Nathan)
|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Issuing court
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (District Court)
|
|
| United States of America |
Appellee in the case
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-04-05
Submission of Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel on behalf of the United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of SDNY court
|
Relationships (1)
Case title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Key Quotes (2)
"On April 05, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, on behalf of the Appellee United States of America, was submitted in the above referenced case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg
Quote #1
"The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason(s):"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,061 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 31, 04/05/2021, 3070287, Page1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
CHIEF JUDGE
CHIEF JUDGE
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
CLERK OF COURT
Date: April 05, 2021
Docket #: 21-58
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Docket #: 21-58
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-
1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-
1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING
On April 05, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, on behalf of the Appellee
United States of America, was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not
comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason(s):
United States of America, was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not
comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason(s):
_______ Failure to submit acknowledgment and notice of appearance (Local Rule 12.3)
_______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
_______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
_______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
_______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
_______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
_______ Missing proof of service
_______ Served to an incorrect address
_______ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
_______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
_______ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here
for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
_______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
_______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
_______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
_______ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
_______ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
_______ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
_______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs
(Local Rule 32.1)
_______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
_______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
_______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
_______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
_______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
_______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
_______ Missing proof of service
_______ Served to an incorrect address
_______ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
_______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
_______ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here
for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
_______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
_______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
_______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
_______ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
_______ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
_______ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
_______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs
(Local Rule 32.1)
_______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
DOJ-OGR-00001310
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document