DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, generally associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The proceedings cover rulings on the testimony of Dr. Loftus regarding suggestive questioning and Agent Young. The court then addresses a motion to preclude the testimony of a witness named Alexander Hamilton, leading to a joke by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim about Broadway tickets and a counter-quote by the Judge referencing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Loftus | Expert Witness |
Mentioned regarding opinions on suggestive questioning techniques.
|
| Agent Young | Witness |
Mentioned regarding testimony and government's views.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Government) |
Responds to the judge stating the government has no questions.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Responds to the judge; makes a joke about Broadway tickets regarding witness Alexander Hamilton.
|
| Alexander Hamilton | Witness |
Subject of a motion to preclude testimony. (Note: Likely a police officer witness in the Maxwell trial, prompting a j...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, making rulings, and quoting Federalist Papers.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| Government |
Prosecution team referred to by Mr. Rohrbach.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing discussing motions to preclude testimony.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number structure.
|
Relationships (2)
MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government
Implied by context of opposing counsel and filing defense responses.
Key Quotes (3)
"We'd like to get Broadway tickets for everyone. That's the best we can do."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
Quote #1
"It was Hamilton in Federal '78 that said, We just have judgment, not will nor force, just judgment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
Quote #2
"So I have the defense response with respect to this witness that came in at 12:31 a.m. this morning."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,523 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 19 of 246 2314
LCGVMAX1
LCGVMAX1
1 believes to be an example of suggestion. This testimony
2 provides a sufficient basis for the jury to consider the
3 relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning
4 techniques. So that's my basis for that ruling.
5 There was argument regarding Agent Young testimony
6 that -- I don't know the government's general views on Agent
7 Young's testimony and I don't need to reach a conclusion on
8 that for purposes of this ruling. So I don't have further
9 guidance on that now.
10 All right. Questions on that?
11 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government, your
12 Honor.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time.
14 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
15 All right. Motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton
16 testimony.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: We'd like to get Broadway tickets for
18 everyone. That's the best we can do.
19 THE COURT: It really is -- yes. It was Hamilton in
20 Federal '78 that said, We just have judgment, not will nor
21 force, just judgment. So I guess this calls for judgment.
22 So I have the defense response with respect to this
23 witness that came in at 12:31 a.m. this morning. I haven't had
24 a chance to work through the issue yet.
25 What's the timing on this witness?
2 provides a sufficient basis for the jury to consider the
3 relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning
4 techniques. So that's my basis for that ruling.
5 There was argument regarding Agent Young testimony
6 that -- I don't know the government's general views on Agent
7 Young's testimony and I don't need to reach a conclusion on
8 that for purposes of this ruling. So I don't have further
9 guidance on that now.
10 All right. Questions on that?
11 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government, your
12 Honor.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time.
14 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
15 All right. Motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton
16 testimony.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: We'd like to get Broadway tickets for
18 everyone. That's the best we can do.
19 THE COURT: It really is -- yes. It was Hamilton in
20 Federal '78 that said, We just have judgment, not will nor
21 force, just judgment. So I guess this calls for judgment.
22 So I have the defense response with respect to this
23 witness that came in at 12:31 a.m. this morning. I haven't had
24 a chance to work through the issue yet.
25 What's the timing on this witness?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016502
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document