Agent Young
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent Maguire
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Prosecutor witness |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Search | A search of a New York residence was conducted. The leadership of the search and the specific age... | New York residence | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of Agent Young by Ms. Comey regarding interviews with a person named Jane about... | Open court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of Agent Young's testimony | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Search | A search of Mr. Epstein's residence where numerous electronic devices were seized, containing mil... | Mr. Epstein's residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008385.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter argues that the government used suggestive questioning techniques on accusers, specifically citing an instance where a witness named 'Jane' changed her testimony regarding a trip to New York and seeing 'The Lion King' after pressure from AUSA Rossmiller. The defense uses this to justify the necessity of expert testimony from Dr. Loftus regarding memory and suggestive questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016810.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of Agent Young by attorney Ms. Comey. The questioning reveals that Agent Young interviewed an individual named 'Jane' about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and that Jane's disclosures were a gradual process over multiple meetings rather than a single event. The transcript also includes a sustained objection by another attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding the scope of the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016808.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing a sidebar conference. Prosecutor Comey argues that FBI Agent Young should be allowed to testify about non-suggestive interview training to rebut defense claims (supported by Dr. Loftus) that witness memories may have been implanted via leading questions. The Judge expresses skepticism, suggesting the line of questioning is 'beyond the scope' and risks 'opening the door' to broader issues regarding interview conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00016781.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge and several lawyers (Pagliuca, Comey, Everdell, Menninger) about witness scheduling. The discussion revolves around the absence of a scheduled witness, Ms. Dubin, a proposal to call another witness, Agent Young, and difficulties in contacting other individuals in Colorado. The judge grants the lawyers a short break to organize their witnesses before resuming the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00016778.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal debate over the execution of a search at a New York residence. Attorneys argue about the specific roles of Special Agent Maguire and Agent Young, particularly concerning who was the overall search leader and who was responsible for extracting files from electronic devices. The judge actively questions the attorneys to clarify these disputed facts.
DOJ-OGR-00016776.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues about the vast amount of data ('millions of files') seized from Mr. Epstein's residence in 2019, contrasting it with the limited evidence presented by the government. A discussion ensues about the witness who testified on this matter, with another attorney, Ms. Comey, correcting Mr. Everdell that the witness was Kimberly Meder, not Mr. Flatley.
DOJ-OGR-00016760.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge, Ms. Comey, and Mr. Everdell. The conversation covers the rules for questioning an adverse witness and the scope of upcoming testimony from Special Agent Young concerning prior statements made by an individual named Jane. Mr. Everdell also indicates his intent to question the absence of modern evidence, such as emails from the 1990s, to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, generally associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The proceedings cover rulings on the testimony of Dr. Loftus regarding suggestive questioning and Agent Young. The court then addresses a motion to preclude the testimony of a witness named Alexander Hamilton, leading to a joke by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim about Broadway tickets and a counter-quote by the Judge referencing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78.
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a discussion during a hearing concerning the relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions, Agent Young's testimony, and a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony. The court also addresses a defense response regarding a witness and references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
Events involving Maxwell and Epstein
Agent Young participated in multiple interviews with Jane, during which Jane disclosed information about Maxwell and Epstein over time, not in a single session.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity