Alexander Hamilton
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Kate
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defense witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a ... | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-15 | N/A | ORDER regarding Government's motion to preclude certain testimony. Deadlines set for responses re... | Court | View |
| 2021-12-15 | N/A | Order requiring Defense response to Government motion to preclude testimony of Dr. Loftus (by 7:4... | Court | View |
| 2021-12-15 | N/A | Order issued regarding defense witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton | Court Docket | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008431.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is a response to the government's motion to prevent a witness, Alexander Hamilton, from testifying about four specific topics related to an individual named 'Kate'. The defense argues that providing Hamilton's declaration to the government under Rule 26.2 does not obligate them to introduce all of its contents as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00020706.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 17 and 19, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding jury charges and verdict sheets, and various letters filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning jury instructions, testimony preclusion (specifically regarding Alexander Hamilton), and closing logistics. The document highlights specific judicial edits to legal definitions, such as defining a 'minor' as an individual under the age of 18.
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020460.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering proceedings from December 16 to December 18, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding witness testimony and jury charges, and correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding prior inconsistent statements and jury instructions. Notably, it records the court's edits to the jury charge, specifically changing the definition of 'a minor' to 'an individual under the age of 18'.
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 12 to December 16, 2021. It details various legal filings including letters regarding witness lists, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions for witness anonymity and setting deadlines for responses regarding witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton. The document also references the placement of sealed documents in a vault.
DOJ-OGR-00018449.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a cross-examination of a person named Kate. The questioning covers a $1,200 payment for therapy and Kate's familiarity with a man named Ray Hamilton, whom she describes as an acquaintance and a friend of a friend, known both in 'the states' and London.
DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, generally associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The proceedings cover rulings on the testimony of Dr. Loftus regarding suggestive questioning and Agent Young. The court then addresses a motion to preclude the testimony of a witness named Alexander Hamilton, leading to a joke by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim about Broadway tickets and a counter-quote by the Judge referencing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78.
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a discussion during a hearing concerning the relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions, Agent Young's testimony, and a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony. The court also addresses a defense response regarding a witness and references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity