DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg
678 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal notice (notice of defective filing)
File Size:
678 KB
Summary
This is a Notice of Defective Filing from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). Dated April 1, 2021, it notifies the defense that a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on March 30, 2021, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules. The document lists various potential reasons for the defect, though no specific reason is visually checked on this page.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Debra Ann Livingston | Chief Judge |
Listed in the header of the Court of Appeals document
|
| Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
Listed in the header of the Court of Appeals document
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Appellant/Defendant |
Subject of the case; filed a Notice of Appearance via counsel that was deemed defective
|
| Nathan | DC Judge |
District Court Judge (Alison Nathan) referenced in the case details
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Issuing court
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (District Court)
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-03-30
Submission of Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell
Counsel (unnamed)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Court address
|
|
|
Court address
|
Relationships (1)
Case Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Key Quotes (2)
"On March 30, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg
Quote #1
"The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,038 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 11, 04/01/2021, 3068130, Page1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
CHIEF JUDGE
CHIEF JUDGE
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
CLERK OF COURT
Date: April 01, 2021
Docket #: 21-770
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Docket #: 21-770
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING
On March 30, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason:
______ Failure to submit acknowledgment and notice of appearance (Local Rule 12.3)
______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
______ Missing proof of service
______ Served to an incorrect address
______ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
______ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
______ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
______ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
______ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
______ Missing proof of service
______ Served to an incorrect address
______ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
______ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
______ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
______ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
______ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
DOJ-OGR-00000904
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document