This is the final page (Conclusion) of a legal motion filed on February 23, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her defense team argues that additional proposed conditions—including renouncing foreign citizenship and asset monitoring—should satisfy the Bail Reform Act. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail motion being concluded.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Attorney |
Defense counsel submitting the motion.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Attorney |
Defense counsel from Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Defense counsel from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C.
|
| Laura A. Menninger | Attorney |
Defense counsel from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim |
Legal representation for the defense.
|
|
| COHEN & GRESSER LLP |
Legal representation for the defense.
|
|
| HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. |
Legal representation for the defense.
|
|
| District Court |
Referenced regarding a retired judge monitoring assets.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002740).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim and Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
|
|
Location of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C.
|
"The Court should grant bail to Ghislaine Maxwell."Source
"The proposed additional conditions of release—renunciation of foreign citizenship and restraint and monitoring of assets by a retired District Court judge—enhance the already extraordinarily restrictive bail conditions proposed in Ms. Maxwell’s Renewed Motion for Bail."Source
"To deny Ms. Maxwell bail when such extraordinary and restrictive conditions are available would be a miscarriage of justice."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,184 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document