West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
017-14.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court (S.D. Florida) dated June 25, 2010, denying Jeffrey Epstein's appeal of Magistrate Judge Johnson's discovery orders. Epstein is ordered to produce documents within three days, with specific instructions to redact names of minor sexual assault victims. The order also restricts the Plaintiff from disclosing Epstein's tax returns or passport to third parties, except for expert witnesses bound by confidentiality.
017-08.pdf
This is a court order from the Southern District of Florida dated February 11, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants in part Epstein's motion for an extension, setting a new deadline of February 26, 2010, for Epstein to appeal Magistrate Judge Johnson's prior order compelling document production. The order also stipulates that if the appeal fails, Epstein must produce the documents within three business days.
005.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of L.M. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-81092-CIV-MARRA), signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on July 30, 2009. The order outlines procedural requirements for counsel to confer and file joint scheduling and discovery reports in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
010-10.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated April 15, 2015, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a supplemental protective order. Epstein sought to keep correspondence between his lawyers and the US Government regarding his non-prosecution agreement sealed from the public. Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the public interest in determining if the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) was violated outweighs Epstein's desire for confidentiality, stating that plea negotiations are not privileged.
010-03.pdf
This is a court order from Judge Kenneth A. Marra denying motions by Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 to join an existing lawsuit filed by Jane Doe 1 and 2 against the US Government regarding violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act in the Epstein case. The judge ruled that adding new parties was unnecessary as their claims were duplicative and they could instead serve as witnesses. Significantly, the Judge sua sponte ordered the striking of 'lurid details' and allegations made by Jane Doe 3 regarding being trafficked to high-profile non-parties (including politicians and world leaders), deeming them impertinent to the specific legal claim against the government. Consequently, Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene to strike these same allegations was denied as moot.
039.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated June 16, 2009, granting a default judgment against Sarah Kellen in a civil case filed by Jane Doe II. Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that Kellen failed to respond to the complaint despite being properly served under New York state law. Jeffrey Epstein is listed as a co-defendant in the case header.
013.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of Florida dated August 21, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders defendant Jeffrey Epstein to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence and Expedite Certain Discovery by August 26, 2008.
022-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CV-80802). The order grants the Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of December 14, 2009, to file an Amended Complaint.
011-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order filed on August 11, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the existing case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes only.
022-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case in May 2010 following a stipulation by the parties, noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.
065.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case with prejudice on December 8, 2009, following a stipulation filed by the parties on December 7, 2009. The order notes that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
016-03.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein and his associates to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically highlighting records of domestic and international travel (including private airplanes), phone communications, financial records, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly prohibits the destruction, alteration, or deletion of potential evidence dating back to 1998.
064-01.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida (Exhibit A), signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. The order mandates that Epstein and his agents preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including records of domestic and international travel on private airplanes, phone communications, computer data, and items resulting from the October 25, 2005 search of his Palm Beach home. It establishes preservation timelines ranging from 1998 to 2005 depending on the specific plaintiff and defines sanctions for wrongful destruction of evidence.
028-03.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion by Plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 101 and 102) to preserve evidence in their cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including flight logs ('travel in Defendant's private airplanes'), phone records, computer data since 1998, financial records regarding payments to victims, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly forbids the destruction, deletion, or alteration of any such evidence.
019.pdf
This document is a consolidated court order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 14, 2009, covering multiple civil lawsuits (Jane Does, C.M.A., etc.) against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra requests the United States government provide its official position regarding Epstein's motion to stay these civil cases. Epstein argued that defending himself in these civil suits might violate his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the USAO and subject him to criminal prosecution.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
005.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 20, 2009. The order directs counsel for Plaintiff 'Jane Do No. 101' and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein to confer and file joint scheduling and discovery reports in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It outlines specific deadlines for these conferences and reports following the filing of an answer or motion.
015.pdf
This document is an Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80447). Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders that all pretrial discovery motions, including motions for sanctions and mental/physical examinations, be referred to Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson for disposition. The order was signed on June 14, 2010.
EFTA00014187.pdf
This document is a Court Order from August 2008 in the civil case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth Marra denied Epstein's motion to stay (pause) the civil lawsuit. Epstein had argued that the case should be paused because of a 'pending' criminal action (referencing ongoing grand jury subpoenas and his deferred prosecution agreement), but the judge ruled that an investigation or deferred prosecution does not meet the legal definition of a 'pending criminal action' under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3509(k).
DOJ-OGR-00030462.jpg
This is an agreed court order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, for the case of the State of Florida v. Jeffrey E. Epstein (Case No. 502006CF009454AXXMB). Signed by Judge Sandra K. McSorley in December 2006, the order postpones a case disposition hearing, originally scheduled for December 8, 2006, for ninety days. The continuance was based on an agreement between the prosecution, represented by Lanna Belohlavek, and the defense, represented by Jack A. Goldberger.
DOJ-OGR-00030450.jpg
This is an agreed court order from the Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated March 5, 2007, for the case of the State of Florida v. Jeffrey E. Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Sandra K. McSorley, continues (postpones) a case disposition hearing originally set for March 8, 2007. Based on an agreement between Epstein's attorney, Jack A. Goldberger, and the state's attorney, Lanna Belohlavek, the hearing is rescheduled for May 16, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00030449.jpg
This document is an agreed court order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated May 11, 2007, in the case of the State of Florida v. Jeffrey E. Epstein. Signed by Judge Sandra K. McSorley, the order continues the case disposition, rescheduling it from May 16, 2007, to November 16, 2007. The continuance was granted based on an agreement between the prosecution, represented by Lanna Belohlavek, and the defense, represented by Jack A. Goldberger, due to the complicated nature of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00030444.jpg
This is an agreed court order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated January 2, 2008, in the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Sandra McSorley, postpones Epstein's trial from its original January 7, 2008 date and reschedules a plea conference for March 10, 2008. The changes were made upon a joint motion by both parties due to new information requiring investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity